As ongoing research efforts contribute to elucidating the consequences of climate change as well as adaptation and mitigation options, aligning the current research knowledge with stakeholder opinions and perceptions remains critical for adopting effective climate change policies. This paper utilizes an interactive survey to (1) address the aforementioned gap in studies involving three groups of stakeholders and opinion makers and (2) perform a comparative primary study of the climate change assumptions, risk perceptions, policy preferences, observations, and knowledge of Czech farmers, governmental policy-makers and researchers. This study shows that the stakeholder groups agree that the climate is clearly changing, attribute this change mostly to man-made causes and expect the negative effects to either prevail or be unevenly geographically distributed. The large majority of all three groups consider unmitigated climate change a major threat even by 2050 and agree that preparing in advance is the best sectoral strategy. Importantly, while investment in adaptation measures is considered the most efficient tool for accelerating the implementation of adaptation measures, the CAP and EU rules (as valid in 2016) are believed to hinder such measures. The results of this study have ramifications for the wider region of Central Europe.

由于正在进行的研究工作有助于阐明气候变化的后果以及适应和缓解方案，因此将当前的研究知识与利益相关者的意见和看法保持一致对于采取有效的气候变化政策仍然至关重要。本文利用互动调查来 (1) 解决涉及三组利益相关者和意见制定者的研究中的上述差距，以及 (2) 对气候变化假设、风险认知、政策偏好、观察和知识进行比较初步研究捷克农民、政府决策者和研究人员。这项研究表明，利益相关者团体同意气候正在明显变化，将这种变化主要归因于人为原因，并预计负面影响将普遍存在或地理分布不均。这三个群体中的大多数人认为，即使到 2050 年，未缓解的气候变化仍会成为主要威胁，并同意提前做好准备是最好的部门战略。重要的是，虽然对适应措施的投资被认为是加速实施适应措施的最有效工具，但人们认为 CAP 和欧盟规则（于 2016 年生效）阻碍了这些措施。这项研究的结果对更广泛的中欧地区产生了影响。虽然对适应措施的投资被认为是加速实施适应措施的最有效工具，但人们认为 CAP 和欧盟规则（于 2016 年生效）阻碍了这些措施。这项研究的结果对更广泛的中欧地区产生了影响。虽然对适应措施的投资被认为是加速实施适应措施的最有效工具，但人们认为 CAP 和欧盟规则（于 2016 年生效）阻碍了这些措施。这项研究的结果对更广泛的中欧地区产生了影响。