当前位置: X-MOL 学术Arabic Sciences and Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
AVICENNA, FῙ AL-ʾUMŪR AL-KULLIYYA MIN ʿILM AL-ṬIBB, ED. NAJAFGHOLI HABIBI (HAMADAN, 2018)
Arabic Sciences and Philosophy Pub Date : 2021-08-23 , DOI: 10.1017/s0957423921000102
Jules Janssens 1
Affiliation  

That Ibn Sīnā’s “Canon of medicine” figures among the major classics of the history of medicine is doubted by no serious historian of medicine, eastern or western, Islamic or non-Islamic alike. It is therefore all the more surprising that so far no serious critical edition of this text was available. Certainly, a first, very timid step toward a really critical edition (published during the years 1982-1996) was made at the Institute of the History of Medicine and Medical Research (New Delhi), under the direction of Hakeem Abdul Hameed (1908-1999). It compared the four existing editions: Rome 1593; Būlāq (Cairo) 1877; Tehran (lithograph) 1878; and Lucknow 1905. In addition it used (a photocopy of) an ancient manuscript of Aya Sophia, dated 618, i. e. MS Aya Sophia 3686. With this new edition a further important step toward a full critical edition is made. Even if it is obvious that it does not yet present a “critical edition” in the full sense of the word, it has important merits.

中文翻译:

AVICENNA, FῙ AL-ʾUMŪR AL-KULLIYYA MIN ʿILM AL-ṬIBB, ED。NAJAFGHOLI HABIBI(哈马丹,2018)

Ibn Sīnā 的“医学经典”在医学史的主要经典中的人物没有受到任何严肃的医学史家的怀疑,无论东方或西方,伊斯兰或非伊斯兰。因此,更令人惊讶的是,迄今为止还没有该文本的严肃批评版本。当然,在 Hakeem Abdul Hameed (1908-1908- 1999)。它比较了四个现有版本:罗马 1593;Būlāq(开罗)1877;德黑兰(石版画)1878;和勒克瑙 1905 年。此外,它还使用了(副本)Aya Sophia 的古代手稿,日期为 618,即 MS Aya Sophia 3686。有了这个新版本,朝着完整的关键版本又迈出了重要的一步。即使很明显它还没有呈现出一个完整意义上的“批判版”,它也有重要的优点。
更新日期:2021-08-23
down
wechat
bug