当前位置：
X-MOL 学术
›
BMC Cardiovasc. Disord.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Association of stent diameter and target vessel revascularization in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a secondary retrospective analysis based on a Chinese cohort study
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-21 , DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02212-1 Tiancheng Xu 1, 2 , Beili Feng 1, 2 , Zaixing Zheng 1, 2 , Licheng Li 1, 2 , Weifang Zeng 1, 2 , Dongjuan Wang 1, 2 , Lin Zhang 1, 2 , Hengdong Li 1, 2
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-21 , DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02212-1 Tiancheng Xu 1, 2 , Beili Feng 1, 2 , Zaixing Zheng 1, 2 , Licheng Li 1, 2 , Weifang Zeng 1, 2 , Dongjuan Wang 1, 2 , Lin Zhang 1, 2 , Hengdong Li 1, 2
Affiliation
In the treatment of coronary heart disease, target vessel revascularization (TVR) has attracted increasing attention as an efficient means of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The purpose of this study was to explore the association between stent diameter and TVR in patients undergoing PCI. This was a secondary retrospective analysis involving patients with PCI with at least one stent implanted. Information was obtained from the Dryad Digital Repository. Multivariable logistic regression models, interaction analyses, subgroup analyses and piecewise linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between stent diameter and TVR. A total of 2522 patients were eventually enrolled in this study, of which 122 (4.8%) had undergone TVR. Significant positive associations were observed between stent diameter and TVR (continuous: odds ratio [OR] 0.485, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.305–0.773, P = 0.002; categorical variable: T2 vs. T1, OR 0.541, 95% CI 0.348–0.843; T3 vs. T1, OR 0.520, 95% CI 0.334–0.809; P for trend = 0.005). The association remained stable in the fully adjusted model (continuous: OR 0.526, 95% CI 0.306–0.902, P = 0.020; categorical variable: T2 vs. T1, OR 0.510, 95% CI 0.310–0.839; T3 vs. T1, OR 0.585, 95% CI 0.352–0.973; P for trend = 0.042). Among the subgroups of differing clinical presentations, stent diameter was a powerful protective factor for TVR, especially in the delayed PCI group (P for interaction = 0.002). The association was highly consistent across all the other subgroups studied (all P for interaction > 0.05). In the piecewise linear regression model, the need for TVR decreased with an increase in stent diameter when this ranged between 2.5 and 2.9 mm (OR 0.01, 95% CI: 0.01–0.13, P < 0.001). A large stent diameter is a powerful protective factor for TVR in PCI patients, especially in the delayed PCI group. This “bigger-is-better” protective effect is remarkable in stents with diameter 2.5–2.9 mm.
更新日期：2021-08-21
京公网安备 11010802027423号