当前位置: X-MOL 学术Information Systems Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The ethics of action research participation
Information Systems Journal ( IF 7.767 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-18 , DOI: 10.1111/isj.12363
Robert M. Davison 1 , Maris G. Martinsons 2 , Louie H. M. Wong 3
Affiliation  

Action research (AR) involves one or more researchers and a client organisation. Many guidelines for and reports of the research method have been published. However, the ethical issues associated with AR have been largely neglected. Our review of the AR literature found that ethical dilemmas and their resolution are rarely and inconsistently reported. Stimulated by this neglect and our personal experiences, we aim to raise awareness and understanding about the ethics of planning, conducting and reporting AR. We identify and discuss four issues of concern that merit specific ethical attention when conducting AR: collaboration, competence, persistence and consent. We draw on these four issues in an analysis that augments the principles and criteria for canonical AR (CAR), recently reified as Integrated Action Research (IAR). Our guidance includes an additional principle of AR and 10 associated criteria to address the ethics of AR participation.

中文翻译:

行动研究参与的伦理

行动研究 (AR) 涉及一名或多名研究人员和一个客户组织。许多研究方法的指南和报告已经出版。然而,与 AR 相关的伦理问题在很大程度上被忽视了。我们对 AR 文献的回顾发现,伦理困境及其解决方案的报道很少且不一致。受到这种忽视和我们个人经历的刺激,我们旨在提高对规划、实施和报告 AR 的道德规范的认识和理解。我们确定并讨论了在进行 AR 时值得特别关注的四个问题:协作、能力、持久性和同意。我们在分析中利用这四个问题,增强了规范 AR (CAR) 的原则和标准,最近被具体化为综合行动研究 (IAR)。
更新日期:2021-08-18
down
wechat
bug