Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Robust Peer Review: Caputo’s Response to Dunleavy
Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services ( IF 1.356 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-18 , DOI: 10.1177/10443894211012236
Richard K. Caputo 1
Affiliation  

In this essay, I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the alternative peer-review processes and the rationale and evidence used by Dunleavy (2021). To move the discussion forward, I end this response with a call to devise a study that would test some of the empirical claims associated with the modified traditional peer-review process I originally proposed (Caputo, 2019) and the one advanced by Dunleavy (2021).



中文翻译:

强有力的同行评议:卡普托对邓利维的回应

在这篇文章中,我讨论了替代同行评审过程的优缺点以及 Dunleavy (2021) 使用的基本原理和证据。为了推进讨论,我在结束这个回应时呼吁设计一项研究,以测试与我最初提出的修改后的传统同行评审程序(Caputo,2019 年)和 Dunleavy 提出的程序(2021 年)相关的一些实证主张)。

更新日期:2021-08-19
down
wechat
bug