In a recent issue of Families in Society, Caputo argues for the “centrality” of peer review in the cultivation of social work knowledge. Specifically, he favors the double-blind model of peer review. In this paper, I argue that social work should adopt a more dynamic set of reviewing practices. First, I define some terminology and discuss the limitations of the current double-blind model. Then, I describe recent trends in peer review, which I argue foster a more robust and open system. I frame this discussion within the context of the wider open science movement and urge social workers to engage with these scholarly practices. In line with these practices and values, a freely accessible preprint is available at: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/rvqze/

在最近一期的社会家庭中，卡普托认为同行评审在社会工作知识培养中的“中心地位”。具体来说，他赞成同行评审的双盲模式。在这篇论文中，我认为社会工作应该采用一套更有活力的审查实践。首先，我定义了一些术语并讨论了当前双盲模型的局限性。然后，我描述了同行评审的最新趋势，我认为这会促进更强大和开放的系统。我在更广泛的开放科学运动的背景下进行讨论，并敦促社会工作者参与这些学术实践。根据这些实践和价值观，可在以下网址免费获取预印本：https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/rvqze/