Diabetes Care ( IF 16.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-10-01 , DOI: 10.2337/dc21-0932 Jose Garcia-Tirado 1 , Jenny L Diaz 1 , Rebeca Esquivel-Zuniga 2 , Chaitanya L K Koravi 1 , John P Corbett 1 , Martha Dawson 1 , Christian Wakeman 1 , Charlotte L Barnett 1 , Mary C Oliveri 1 , Helen Myers 1 , Katie Krauthause , Marc D Breton 1 , Mark D DeBoer 2, 3
Meals are a major hurdle to glycemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Our objective was to test a fully automated closed-loop control (CLC) system in the absence of announcement of carbohydrate ingestion among adolescents with T1D, who are known to commonly omit meal announcement.
Eighteen adolescents with T1D (age 15.6 ± 1.7 years; HbA1c 7.4 ± 1.5%; 9 females/9 males) participated in a randomized crossover clinical trial comparing our legacy hybrid CLC system (Unified Safety System Virginia [USS]-Virginia) with a novel fully automated CLC system (RocketAP) during two 46-h supervised admissions (each with one announced and one unannounced dinner), following 2 weeks of data collection. Primary outcome was the percentage time-in-range 70–180 mg/dL (TIR) following the unannounced meal, with secondary outcomes related to additional continuous glucose monitoring-based metrics.
Both TIR and time-in-tight-range 70–140 mg/dL (TTR) were significantly higher using RocketAP than using USS-Virginia during the 6 h following the unannounced meal (83% [interquartile range 64–93] vs. 53% [40–71]; P = 0.004 and 49% [41–59] vs. 27% [22–36]; P = 0.002, respectively), primarily driven by reduced time-above-range (TAR >180 mg/dL: 17% [1.3–34] vs. 47% [28–60]), with no increase in time-below-range (TBR <70 mg/dL: 0% median for both). RocketAP also improved control following the announced meal (mean difference TBR: –0.7%, TIR: +7%, TTR: +6%), overall (TIR: +5%, TAR: –5%, TTR: +8%), and overnight (TIR: +7%, TTR: +19%, TAR: –5%). RocketAP delivered less insulin overall (78 ± 23 units vs. 85 ± 20 units, P = 0.01).
A new fully automated CLC system with automatic prandial dosing was proven to be safe and feasible and outperformed our legacy USS-Virginia in an adolescent population with and without meal announcement.
中文翻译:
与混合闭环系统相比,先进的闭环控制系统可改善餐后血糖控制
膳食是 1 型糖尿病 (T1D) 血糖控制的主要障碍。我们的目标是测试一个全自动闭环控制 (CLC) 系统,在 T1D 青少年中没有碳水化合物摄入的公告,他们通常会忽略进餐公告。
18 名 T1D 青少年(年龄 15.6 ± 1.7 岁;HbA 1c 7.4 ± 1.5%;9 名女性/9 名男性)参加了一项随机交叉临床试验,比较我们的传统混合 CLC 系统(统一安全系统弗吉尼亚 [USS]-弗吉尼亚)与在收集了 2 周的数据后,在两次 46 小时有监督的入院(每个有一次宣布和一次未宣布的晚餐)期间使用了新型全自动 CLC 系统 (RocketAP)。主要结果是突击餐后 70–180 mg/dL (TIR) 范围内的时间百分比,次要结果与额外的基于持续血糖监测的指标相关。
使用 RocketAP 后的 6 小时内,TIR 和紧缩范围内的时间 70–140 mg/dL (TTR) 显着高于使用 USS-Virginia(83% [四分位距 64–93] vs. 53 % [40–71];P = 0.004 和 49% [41–59] vs. 27% [22–36];分别为P = 0.002),主要是由于超范围时间减少(TAR >180 mg/ dL:17% [1.3–34] 与 47% [28–60]),低于范围的时间没有增加(TBR <70 mg/dL:两者的中位数均为 0%)。RocketAP 还在宣布餐后改善了控制(平均差异 TBR:–0.7%,TIR:+7%,TTR:+6%),总体(TIR:+5%,TAR:–5%,TTR:+8%)和过夜(TIR:+7%,TTR:+19%,TAR:–5%)。RocketAP 提供的胰岛素总体较少(78 ± 23 单位对 85 ± 20 单位,P = 0.01)。
具有自动膳食剂量的新型全自动 CLC 系统已被证明是安全可行的,并且在有和没有膳食通知的青少年人群中表现优于我们传统的 USS-Virginia。