当前位置: X-MOL 学术Diabetes Care › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Advanced Closed-Loop Control System Improves Postprandial Glycemic Control Compared With a Hybrid Closed-Loop System Following Unannounced Meal
Diabetes Care ( IF 16.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-10-01 , DOI: 10.2337/dc21-0932
Jose Garcia-Tirado 1 , Jenny L Diaz 1 , Rebeca Esquivel-Zuniga 2 , Chaitanya L K Koravi 1 , John P Corbett 1 , Martha Dawson 1 , Christian Wakeman 1 , Charlotte L Barnett 1 , Mary C Oliveri 1 , Helen Myers 1 , Katie Krauthause , Marc D Breton 1 , Mark D DeBoer 2, 3
Affiliation  

OBJECTIVE

Meals are a major hurdle to glycemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Our objective was to test a fully automated closed-loop control (CLC) system in the absence of announcement of carbohydrate ingestion among adolescents with T1D, who are known to commonly omit meal announcement.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Eighteen adolescents with T1D (age 15.6 ± 1.7 years; HbA1c 7.4 ± 1.5%; 9 females/9 males) participated in a randomized crossover clinical trial comparing our legacy hybrid CLC system (Unified Safety System Virginia [USS]-Virginia) with a novel fully automated CLC system (RocketAP) during two 46-h supervised admissions (each with one announced and one unannounced dinner), following 2 weeks of data collection. Primary outcome was the percentage time-in-range 70–180 mg/dL (TIR) following the unannounced meal, with secondary outcomes related to additional continuous glucose monitoring-based metrics.

RESULTS

Both TIR and time-in-tight-range 70–140 mg/dL (TTR) were significantly higher using RocketAP than using USS-Virginia during the 6 h following the unannounced meal (83% [interquartile range 64–93] vs. 53% [40–71]; P = 0.004 and 49% [41–59] vs. 27% [22–36]; P = 0.002, respectively), primarily driven by reduced time-above-range (TAR >180 mg/dL: 17% [1.3–34] vs. 47% [28–60]), with no increase in time-below-range (TBR <70 mg/dL: 0% median for both). RocketAP also improved control following the announced meal (mean difference TBR: –0.7%, TIR: +7%, TTR: +6%), overall (TIR: +5%, TAR: –5%, TTR: +8%), and overnight (TIR: +7%, TTR: +19%, TAR: –5%). RocketAP delivered less insulin overall (78 ± 23 units vs. 85 ± 20 units, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A new fully automated CLC system with automatic prandial dosing was proven to be safe and feasible and outperformed our legacy USS-Virginia in an adolescent population with and without meal announcement.



中文翻译:

与混合闭环系统相比,先进的闭环控制系统可改善餐后血糖控制

客观的

膳食是 1 型糖尿病 (T1D) 血糖控制的主要障碍。我们的目标是测试一个全自动闭环控制 (CLC) 系统,在 T1D 青少年中没有碳水化合物摄入的公告,他们通常会忽略进餐公告。

研究设计和方法

18 名 T1D 青少年(年龄 15.6 ± 1.7 岁;HbA 1c 7.4 ± 1.5%;9 名女性/9 名男性)参加了一项随机交叉临床试验,比较我们的传统混合 CLC 系统(统一安全系统弗吉尼亚 [USS]-弗吉尼亚)与在收集了 2 周的数据后,在两次 46 小时有监督的入院(每个有一次宣布和一次未宣布的晚餐)期间使用了新型全自动 CLC 系统 (RocketAP)。主要结果是突击餐后 70–180 mg/dL (TIR) 范围内的时间百分比,次要结果与额外的基于持续血糖监测的指标相关。

结果

使用 RocketAP 后的 6 小时内,TIR 和紧缩范围内的时间 70–140 mg/dL (TTR) 显着高于使用 USS-Virginia(83% [四分位距 64–93] vs. 53 % [40–71];P = 0.004 和 49% [41–59] vs. 27% [22–36];分别为P = 0.002),主要是由于超范围时间减少(TAR >180 mg/ dL:17% [1.3–34] 与 47% [28–60]),低于范围的时间没有增加(TBR <70 mg/dL:两者的中位数均为 0%)。RocketAP 还在宣布餐后改善了控制(平均差异 TBR:–0.7%,TIR:+7%,TTR:+6%),总体(TIR:+5%,TAR:–5%,TTR:+8%)和过夜(TIR:+7%,TTR:+19%,TAR:–5%)。RocketAP 提供的胰岛素总体较少(78 ± 23 单位对 85 ± 20 单位,P = 0.01)。

结论

具有自动膳食剂量的新型全自动 CLC 系统已被证明是安全可行的,并且在有和没有膳食通知的青少年人群中表现优于我们传统的 USS-Virginia。

更新日期:2021-10-08
down
wechat
bug