All facets of cannabis use – that is, use rates, use contexts, use modes, and user groups – are influenced by multiple factors, reflecting in practice Duff’s argument that there is considerable diversity in how cannabis is constructed as an object of knowledge and practice (Duff, 2016). Furthermore, these conceptual shifts from understanding cannabis as one drug – a singular substance with a consistent identity regardless of how it may be consumed (Duff, 2016) – have been accompanied by recent substantive changes in the factors influencing its use. First and foremost, these include political frameworks concerning the legal status of cannabis around the globe. These legal shifts have precipitated numerous other changes, both foreseen and unforeseen. For example, a range of novel cannabis products has entered the market and their availability (Bretteville-Jensen, 2019) and accessibility has increased through the internet and social media (Demant et al., 2019). These novel products, such as edibles, vape pens, body lotion, eye drops etc. both reflect and generate novel intake modes. Even the traditional herbal cannabis has changed, with significant increase in tetrahydrocannabinol content since 2010 (Bachs & Havig, 2019).

中文翻译：

---

探索大麻的本体政治：挪威改变毒品政策和理解

大麻使用的所有方面——即使用率、使用环境、使用模式和用户群体——都受到多种因素的影响，这在实践中反映了 Duff 的论点，即大麻作为知识和实践对象的构建方式存在相当大的差异（达夫，2016）。此外，这些概念转变从将大麻理解为一种药物——一种具有一致特性的单一物质，无论它如何被消费（达夫，2016 年）——伴随着最近影响其使用的因素发生了实质性变化。首先，这些包括有关全球大麻法律地位的政治框架。这些法律转变催生了许多其他可预见和不可预见的变化。例如，一系列新型大麻产品已进入市场，其可用性（Bretteville-Jensen，2019 年）和可访问性通过互联网和社交媒体增加（Demant 等人，2019 年）。食品、电子烟笔、润肤露、眼药水等这些新产品，既反映又产生新的摄入方式。甚至传统的草本大麻也发生了变化，