Providing developmental peer reviewers is one of the most critical services performed by researchers in the organizational sciences (Bedeian, 2003). Yet, completing helpful and constructive reviews is not easy (Epstein, 1995; Feldman, 2005). This challenge may be due, in part, to the fact that our field provides only limited formal reviewer training in graduate programs and through professional development workshops (PDWs). Much of what new reviewers learn happens through informal training with mentors (Carpenter, 2009). Without effective training, reviewers may be prone to biases in their methodological evaluations of manuscripts (Banks et al., 2016; Bedeian, Taylor, & Miller, 2010; Emerson et al., 2010) or may simply lack the expertise needed to evaluate manuscripts due to the large variety of content areas and methodological techniques being employed in research.

中文翻译：

---

客座社论：ORM-CARMA 用于高级审​​稿人开发的虚拟功能主题

提供发展性同行评审员是组织科学研究人员提供的最重要的服务之一（Bedeian，2003 年）。然而，完成有益和建设性的评论并不容易（Epstein，1995；Feldman，2005）。这一挑战可能部分是由于我们的领域在研究生课程和专业发展研讨会 (PDW) 中仅提供有限的正式审查员培训。新审稿人学到的大部分知识都是通过与导师的非正式培训来实现的（Carpenter，2009 年）。如果没有有效的培训，审稿人在对稿件的方法论评估中可能容易产生偏见（Banks 等，2016；Bedeian、Taylor 和 Miller，2010；Emerson 等，