当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of International Dispute Settlement › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Complying with Custom before the World Court: Towards a Relational Normativity
Journal of International Dispute Settlement ( IF 0.982 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-23 , DOI: 10.1093/jnlids/idab020
Matthias Vanhullebusch

Traditionally, institutional constraints informed the International Court of Justice’s ascertainment of the (non-) existence of customary norms in its decisions as it signals impartiality to uphold its legitimacy. Its reliance on (non-)legal elements underpinning the sources of the normativity of existing and future customary norms upon which it rules goes beyond the mutual acceptance of treaties and customs by the conflicting parties as well as shared (nascent) moral values of the international community. Its denial of the application of customary international law based on functional and equitable arguments gives further evidence of the Court’s relational and contextual approach towards the peaceful resolution of disputes. In addition to its rule-based governance function, the Court is actively pursuing relational governance. It seeks to reconcile competing relationships and interests inside and outside the courtroom and anticipates if a fertile soil is present in which existing and future customary norms can gain root.

中文翻译:

在世界法庭上遵守习惯:走向关系规范

传统上,制度限制为国际法院在其决定中确定(不)存在习惯规范提供了依据,因为它表明了维护其合法性的公正性。它对(非)法律要素的依赖支持其所依据的现有和未来习惯规范的规范性来源,超出了冲突各方对条约和习惯的相互接受以及国际社会的共同(新生)道德价值观。社区。它基于功能和公平的论点拒绝适用习惯国际法,进一步证明了法院对和平解决争端的关系和背景方法。除了基于规则的治理职能外,法院还在积极寻求关系治理。
更新日期:2021-07-23
down
wechat
bug