当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Wildl. Manage. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A Perspective on the Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management ( IF 2.3 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-10 , DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22110
Douglas H. Johnson 1 , Charles Anderson 2 , Roger D. Applegate 3 , Larissa Bailey 4 , Evan Cooch 5 , John Fieberg 6 , Alan B. Franklin 7 , R. J. Gutiérrez 6 , Karl V. Miller 8 , James D. Nichols 9 , Neal D. Niemuth 10 , David Otis 4 , Christine A. Ribic 11 , Mary M. Rowland 12 , Terry L. Shaffer 13
Affiliation  

The Journal of Wildlife Management (JWM) Editor-in-Chief, P. R. Krausman, invited the lead author of this editorial to convene other senior and mid-career scientists to assess the good, bad, and ugly aspects of publication in JWM relative to similar journals. The 15 authors have considerable experience and are well published in JWM and other journals. The number of years of experience will go unreported here, but the number of papers published in JWM by each author ranges from 2 to 37, with a median of 13. We therefore bring a broad perspective to this editorial.

We focused on 4 questions:
  • 1.

    What are the positive aspects of publishing in JWM?

  • 2.

    What are the negatives of doing so?

  • 3.

    Should The Wildlife Society (TWS) be concerned about the relatively low impact factor of JWM?

  • 4.

    Do we have any suggestions for improvements for JWM?

Because the authors brought unique perspectives to the effort, our editorial is not intended to be a consensus document. Although most authors agreed with most of the comments, we chose not to water down any opinions to gain total agreement. Hence, although most of us are primarily researchers, we hope our views capture those of many members of TWS, recognizing that TWS members will also hold a diversity of views.



中文翻译:

野生动物管理杂志的观点

野生动物管理杂志》 ( JWM ) 主编 PR Krausman 邀请本社论的主要作者召集其他资深和中期职业科学家,评估JWM出版物相对于类似内容的好、坏和丑陋方面期刊。这 15 位作者拥有丰富的经验,并在JWM和其他期刊上发表了大量文章。经验年数在此不作报告,但每位作者在JWM 上发表的论文数量从 2 到 37 不等,中位数为 13。因此,我们为这篇社论带来了广阔的视角。

我们专注于4个问题:
  • 1.

    JWM中发布有哪些积极方面?

  • 2.

    这样做有什么负面影响?

  • 3.

    The Wildlife Society (TWS) 是否应该关注JWM相对较低的影响因子?

  • 4.

    我们对JWM 的改进有什么建议吗?

由于作者为这项工作带来了独特的观点,我们的社论并不打算成为共识文件。尽管大多数作者同意大多数评论,但我们选择不淡化任何意见以获得完全同意。因此,尽管我们中的大多数人主要是研究人员,但我们希望我们的观点能反映 TWS 的许多成员的观点,因为我们认识到 TWS 成员也将持有不同的观点。

更新日期:2021-08-11
down
wechat
bug