A comparison of prostate cancer prediction models in men undergoing both magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal biopsy: Are the models still relevant?,BJU International

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › BJU Int. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

A comparison of prostate cancer prediction models in men undergoing both magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal biopsy: Are the models still relevant?
BJU International ( IF 4.5 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-09 , DOI: 10.1111/bju.15554
Paul Doan ₁ , Petra Graham ₂ , John Lahoud ₁ , Sebastiaan Remmers ₃ , Monique J Roobol ₃ , Lawrence Kim _{1,

4} , Manish I Patel _{1,

4}

Affiliation

To externally validate and compare the performance of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer risk calculator 3/4 (ERSPC-RC3/4), the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group risk calculator (PBCG-RC) and the van Leeuwen model to determine which prediction model would perform the best in a contemporary Australian cohort undergoing transperineal (TP) biopsy.

中文翻译：

在接受磁共振成像和经会阴活检的男性中比较前列腺癌预测模型：这些模型仍然相关吗？

外部验证和比较欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究风险计算器 3/4 (ERSPC-RC3/4)、前列腺活检协作组风险计算器 (PBCG-RC) 和 van Leeuwen 模型的性能，以确定哪些预测模型将在当代澳大利亚进行经会阴 (TP) 活检的队列中表现最佳。

更新日期：2021-08-10

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

阅读更多本刊最新论文本刊介绍/投稿指南

全部期刊列表>>