当前位置: X-MOL 学术Criminal Law and Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Author’s Reply: Negligence and Normative Import
Criminal Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2021-08-07 , DOI: 10.1007/s11572-021-09602-8
Katrina L. Sifferd 1 , Tyler K. Fagan 1
Affiliation  

In this paper we attempt to reply to the thoughtful comments made on our book, Responsible Brains, by a stellar group of scholars. Our reply focuses on two topics discussed in the commenting papers: first, the issue of responsibility for negligent behavior; and second, the broad claim that facts about brain function are normatively inert. In response to worries that our theory lacks normative implications, we will concentrate on an area where our theory has clear relevance to law and legal policy: juvenile responsibility.



中文翻译:

作者回复:疏忽与规范导入

在这篇论文中,我们试图回应一群杰出的学者对我们的书《负责任的大脑》提出的深思熟虑的评论。我们的答复集中在评论稿中讨论的两个主题:第一,过失行为的责任问题;其次,关于大脑功能的事实在规范上是惰性的这一广泛主张。为了回应人们对我们的理论缺乏规范性含义的担忧,我们将专注于我们的理论与法律和法律政策具有明确相关性的领域:少年责任。

更新日期:2021-08-09
down
wechat
bug