当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Interpersonal Violence › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
“If I’d Had Something Like SAFE at the Time, Maybe I Would’ve Left Him Sooner.”—Essential Features of eHealth Interventions for Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
Journal of Interpersonal Violence ( IF 2.621 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-06 , DOI: 10.1177/08862605211036108
Nicole van Gelder 1 , Suzanne Ligthart 1 , Julia ten Elzen 1 , Judith Prins 1 , Karin van Rosmalen-Nooijens 1 , Sabine Oertelt-Prigione 1
Affiliation  

Approximately one in three women worldwide experiences intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) in her lifetime. Despite its frequent occurrence and severe consequences, women often refrain from seeking help. eHealth has the potential to remove some of the barriers women face in help seeking and disclosing. To guarantee the client-centeredness of an (online) intervention it is important to involve the target group and people with expertise in the development process. Therefore, we conducted an interview study with survivors and professionals, in order to assess needs, obstacles, and wishes with regard to an eHealth intervention for women experiencing IPVA. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 women (8 survivors and 8 professionals) between 22 and 52 years old, with varied experiences of IPVA and help. Qualitative data was analyzed using a grounded theory approach and open thematic coding. During analysis we identified a third stakeholder group within the study population: survivor-professionals, with both personal experiences of and professional knowledge on IPVA. All stakeholder groups largely agree on the priorities for an eHealth intervention: safety, acknowledgment, contact with fellow survivors, and help. Nevertheless, the groups offer different perspectives, with the survivor-professionals functioning as a bridge group between the survivors and professionals. The groups prioritize different topics. For example, survivors and survivor-professionals highlighted the essential need for safety, while professionals underlined the importance of acknowledgment. Survivor-professionals were the only ones to emphasize the importance of addressing various life domains. The experiences of professionals and survivors highlight a broad range of needs and potential obstacles for eHealth interventions. Consideration of these findings could improve the client-centeredness of existing and future (online) interventions for women experiencing IPVA.



中文翻译:

“如果当时我有像 SAFE 这样的东西,也许我会早点离开他。”——针对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的电子医疗干预的基本特征:一项定性研究

全世界约有三分之一的女性在其一生中经历过亲密伴侣暴力和虐待 (IPVA)。尽管这种情况经常发生并造成严重后果,但妇女往往不寻求帮助。电子健康有可能消除女性在寻求和披露帮助方面面临的一些障碍。为了保证(在线)干预以客户为中心,让目标群体和具有专业知识的人员参与开发过程非常重要。因此,我们对幸存者和专业人士进行了访谈研究,以评估对 IPVA 妇女进行电子医疗干预方面的需求、障碍和愿望。对年龄在 22 至 52 岁之间的 16 名女性(8 名幸存者和 8 名专业人士)进行了半结构化访谈,她们在 IPVA 和帮助方面有着不同的经验。使用扎根理论方法和开放主题编码分析定性数据。在分析过程中,我们确定了研究人群中的第三个利益相关者群体:幸存者专业人士,拥有 IPVA 的个人经验和专业知识。所有利益相关者群体都对电子卫生保健干预的优先事项达成一致:安全、认可、与其他幸存者的联系和帮助。然而,这些团体提供了不同的观点,幸存者专业人士充当幸存者和专业人士之间的桥梁团体。这些小组优先考虑不同的主题。例如,幸存者和幸存者专业人士强调了对安全的基本需求,而专业人士则强调了承认的重要性。幸存者专家是唯一强调解决各种生活领域重要性的人。专业人员和幸存者的经验凸显了电子卫生保健干预的广泛需求和潜在障碍。考虑这些发现可以提高针对 IPVA 女性的现有和未来(在线)干预措施的以客户为中心。

更新日期:2021-08-07
down
wechat
bug