The study examines the energy consumption for paddy harvesting and wheat sowing using different techniques. The research was planned with ten treatments using three straw management practices, i.e., Retention, Incorporation, and Removal of straw. Major portion of energy is consumed in form of diesel energy, which was the highest energy consumption source, with a participation of 79.3 to 86.5%. It was resulted that T4 had the opulent while T7 had the miserable yield. Least energy was consumed in treatment T2 (1582.9 MJ ha-1) and the most was in treatment T5 (3500.4 MJ ha-1). The specific energy consumption was 25.47, 24.94, 27.74, 49.68, 58.15, 46.60, 55.82, 51.43, 53.01 and 37.78 MJ ha-1, respectively for Treatment T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, and T10. Specific energy is more in removal and incorporation of straw residue practices in comparison to residue retention practices. It can be concluded that treatments using direct drilling machine was the most efficient in case of specific energy consumption. Residue retention tillage practice with happy seeder should be used to make higher productivity with efficient energy input to manage paddy residue.

中文翻译：

---

传统与先进稻谷秸秆管理技术的小麦播种能耗比较

该研究检查了使用不同技术的稻谷收获和小麦播种的能源消耗。该研究计划使用三种秸秆管理实践进行 10 次处理，即保留、掺入和去除秸秆。大部分能源以柴油能源形式消耗，是最高的能源消耗来源，参与率为79.3%至86.5%。结果T4丰收，T7产量惨淡。处理 T2 消耗的能量最少（1582.9 MJ ha-1），处理 T5 消耗的能量最多（3500.4 MJ ha-1）。处理T1、T2、T3、T6、T7、T5的单位能耗分别为25.47、24.94、27.74、49.68、58.15、46.60、55.82、51.43、53.01和37.78 MJ ha-1和T10。与残留物保留实践相比，特定能量更多地用于去除和结合秸秆残留实践。可以得出结论，在特定能量消耗的情况下，使用直接钻孔机的处理是最有效的。应使用快乐播种机的残留物保留耕作实践，以通过有效的能量输入来管理稻谷残留物，从而提高生产力。