当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Experimental Social Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
When dueling emotions and conflicting beliefs predict subjective ambivalence: The role of meta-bases
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology ( IF 3.532 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-04 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104204
Ya Hui Michelle See 1 , Andrew Luttrell 2
Affiliation  

Within the emotions and beliefs upon which attitudes are based, people can hold simultaneously positive and negative reactions. In addition, independent from the emotions and beliefs in their attitude structure, people hold subjective perceptions about their affective and cognitive attitudinal bases (i.e., meta-bases), which reflect interest in processing emotions or beliefs, respectively. We tested how much people experience subjective ambivalence when they hold mixed positive and negative affective or cognitive reactions and whether this depends on relevant meta-bases. In Study 1, for an attitude object dominated by affective meta-bases (i.e., strong interest in processing emotions), intra-affect conflict (IAC), but not intra-cognition conflict (ICC), predicted subjective ambivalence (SA). Moreover, individual differences in meta-bases mattered. Even for a normatively affective meta-basis topic, ICC predicted SA among individuals with relatively cognitive meta-bases but not those with relatively affective meta-bases (Study 2). Similarly, even for a normatively cognitive meta-basis topic, IAC predicted SA among individuals with relatively affective meta-bases but not those with cognitive meta-bases (Study 3). In Study 4, both IAC and ICC's effects on SA were moderated by individual differences in meta-bases for a topic without a clearly normative meta-basis. Study 5 demonstrated that ICC caused more SA for individuals who received cognitive meta-bases feedback than those who received affective meta-bases feedback, whereas IAC caused more SA for individuals who received affective meta-bases feedback than cognitive meta-bases feedback. Thus, we shed light on novel distinctions between intra-affect and intra-cognition conflict in the experience of ambivalence.



中文翻译:

当决斗情绪和相互冲突的信念预测主观矛盾时:元基础的作用

在态度所基于的情绪和信念中,人们可以同时持有积极和消极的反应。此外,独立于态度结构中的情绪和信念,人们对其情感和认知态度基础(即元基础)持有主观感知,分别反映对处理情绪或信念的兴趣。我们测试了当人们持有混合的正面和负面情感或认知反应时有多少人会经历主观矛盾,以及这是否取决于相关的元基础。在研究 1 中,对于由情感元基础(即对处理情绪的强烈兴趣)主导的态度对象,情感内冲突(IAC),而不是认知内冲突(ICC),预测了主观矛盾心理(SA)。此外,元基础的个体差异也很重要。即使对于规范的情感元基础主题,ICC 预测了具有相对认知元基础的个体中的 SA,而不是具有相对情感元基础的个体(研究 2)。类似地,即使对于规范的认知元基础主题,IAC 也预测了具有相对情感元基础的个体的 SA,而不是具有认知元基础的个体(研究 3)。在研究 4 中,IAC 和 ICC 对 SA 的影响都受到没有明确规范元基础的主题元基础的个体差异的调节。研究 5 表明,ICC 对接受认知元基础反馈的个体产生的 SA 比接受情感元基础反馈的个体更多,而 IAC 对接受情感元基础反馈的个体引起的 SA 比接受认知元基础反馈的个体更多。因此,

更新日期:2021-08-04
down
wechat
bug