In the article by Lanzkron and colleagues (1), the data for the comparisons between infusion centers (ICs) and the emergency department (ED) for discharge home versus admission to the hospital were incorrectly reported in the abstract, text, and Table 4. Specifically, the probabilities for treatment sites (IC and ED) were incorrectly labeled as probability of discharge home rather than of admission to the hospital in Table 4. The authors have corrected these errors by reporting the probabilities and comparisons between IC and ED (risk ratios and risk differences) for admission to the hospital to be consistent throughout.

Reference

• 1. Lanzkron S ,  Little J ,  Wang H , et al. Treatment of acute pain in adults with sickle cell disease in an infusion center versus the emergency department. A multicenter prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 6 July 2021. [Epub ahead of print].. [PMID: 34224261] doi:10.7326/M20-7171 LinkGoogle Scholar

中文翻译：

---

更正：在输液中心与急诊室治疗镰状细胞病成人的急性疼痛

在 Lanzkron 及其同事的文章 (1) 中，摘要、正文和表 4 错误地报告了输液中心 (IC) 和急诊科 (ED) 出院回家与入院的比较数据。具体而言，治疗部位（IC 和 ED）的概率在表 4 中被错误地标记为出院回家的概率，而不是入院的概率。 作者通过报告 IC 和 ED 之间的概率和比较（风险比）纠正了这些错误和风险差异），以便入院自始至终保持一致。

参考

• 1. 兰兹克朗 ,  小J ,  王海 , 等. 在输液中心与急诊科治疗成人镰状细胞病的急性疼痛。一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。 安实习医生。 2021 年 7 月 6 日。 [Epub 印刷前]。. [PMID：34224261] 做：10.7326/M20-7171 链接谷歌学术