当前位置: X-MOL 学术Sport in Society › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Can international sports mega events be considered physical activity interventions? A systematic review and quality assessment of large-scale population studies
Sport in Society ( IF 1.578 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-02 , DOI: 10.1080/17430437.2021.1957834
Michael Annear 1 , Shintaro Sato 1 , Tetsuhiro Kidokoro 2 , Yasuo Shimizu 3
Affiliation  

Abstract

Amidst ongoing debate about the viability of physical activity (PA) legacies associated with hosting international sports mega events, this systematic review explores quantitative evidence from population studies that utilize repeated measures. This review is guided by the PRISMA protocol and includes article quality evaluation techniques from health intervention research. Structured Boolean searches were conducted across six databases and grey literature sources. In total, 12 studies were identified from the last two decades across four event typologies. Among these studies, 9 were evaluated as being of higher quality, but only 4 employed standard definitions or measures of PA. Among the higher quality studies, two-thirds found no evidence for statistically significantly PA legacies, although gaps and limitations precluded definitive assessment. Common concerns include limited evaluation of covariates, sweeping conclusions based on insufficient evidence, arbitrary conceptualization and operalization of PA, and lack of triangulation. Research recommendations for resolving the impasse are proposed.



中文翻译:

可以将国际体育大型赛事视为体育活动干预措施吗?大规模人口研究的系统评价和质量评估

摘要

在关于与举办国际体育大型赛事相关的体育活动 (PA) 遗产的可行性的持续辩论中,本系统评价探讨了利用重复测量的人口研究的定量证据。该审查以 PRISMA 协议为指导,包括来自健康干预研究的文章质量评估技术。在六个数据库和灰色文献资源中进行结构化布尔搜索。在过去的二十年中,总共确定了 12 项研究,涉及四种事件类型。在这些研究中,有 9 项被评估为质量更高,但只有 4 项采用了 PA 的标准定义或测量方法。在更高质量的研究中,三分之二的研究没有发现有统计学意义的 PA 遗产的证据,尽管差距和局限性排除了明确的评估。常见的担忧包括对协变量的有限评估、基于证据不足的全面结论、PA 的任意概念化和操作化以及缺乏三角测量。提出解决僵局的研究建议。

更新日期:2021-08-02
down
wechat
bug