当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Affect. Disord. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Primary Prevention of Depression: An Umbrella Review of Controlled Interventions
Journal of Affective Disorders ( IF 6.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-31 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.101
Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo 1 , Marco Solmi 2 , Julio Vaquerizo-Serrano 3 , Joaquim Radua 4 , Anastassia Passina 5 , Pierluca Mosillo 5 , Christoph U Correll 6 , Stefan Borgwardt 7 , Silvana Galderisi 8 , Andreas Bechdolf 9 , Andrea Pfennig 10 , Michael Bauer 10 , Lars Vedel Kessing 11 , Therese van Amelsvoort 12 , Dorien H Nieman 13 , Katharina Domschke 14 , Marie-Odile Krebs 15 , Michael Sand 16 , Eduard Vieta 17 , Philip McGuire 18 , Celso Arango 19 , Jae Il Shin 20 , Paolo Fusar-Poli 21
Affiliation  

Background: Primary prevention has the potential to modify the course of depression, but the consistency and magnitude of this effect are currently undetermined.

Methods: PRISMA and RIGHT compliant (PROSPERO:CRD42020179659) systematic meta-review, PubMed/Web of Science, up to June 2020. Meta-analyses of controlled interventions for the primary prevention of depressive symptoms [effect measures: standardized mean difference (SMD)] or depressive disorders [effect measure: relative risk (RR)] were carried out. Results were stratified by: (i) age range; (ii) target population (general and/or at-risk); (iii) intervention type. Quality (assessed with AMSTAR/AMSTAR-PLUS content) and credibility (graded as high/moderate/low) were assessed. USPSTF grading system was used for recommendations.

Results: Forty-six meta-analyses (k=928 individual studies, n=286,429 individuals, mean age=22.4 years, 81.1% female) were included. Effect sizes were: SMD=0.08-0.53; for depressive symptoms; RR=0.90-0.28 for depressive disorders. Sensitivity analyses including only RCTs did not impact the findings. AMSTAR median=9 (IQR=8-9); AMSTAR-PLUS content median=4.25 (IQR=4-5). Credibility of the evidence was insufficient/low in 43 (93.5%) meta-analyses, moderate in two (4.3%), and high in one (2.2%): reduction of depressive symptoms using psychosocial interventions for young adults only, and a combination of psychological and educational interventions in primary care had moderate credibility; preventive administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for depressive disorders in individuals with a stroke had high credibility.

Limitations: Intervention heterogeneity and lack of long-term efficacy evaluation.

Conclusions: Primary preventive interventions for depression might be effective. Among them, clinicians may offer SSRIs post-stroke to prevent depressive disorders, and psychosocial interventions for children/adolescents/young adults with risk factors or during the prenatal/perinatal period.



中文翻译:

抑郁症的一级预防:受控干预的总括审查

背景:一级预防有可能改变抑郁症的病程,但这种影响的一致性和程度目前尚未确定。

方法: PRISMA 和 RIGHT 兼容 (PROSPERO:CRD42020179659) 系统性荟萃评论,PubMed/Web of Science,截至 2020 年 6 月。对抑郁症状一级预防的受控干预措施的荟萃分析 [效果测量:标准化平均差 (SMD) ] 或抑郁症 [效果测量:相对风险 (RR)]。结果按以下因素分层:(i) 年龄范围;(ii) 目标人群(一般和/或高危人群);(iii) 干预类型。评估质量(用 AMSTAR/AMSTAR-PLUS 内容评估)和可信度(分级为高/中/低)。USPSTF 分级系统用于推荐。

结果:包括 46 项荟萃分析(k=928 个人研究,n=286,429 个人,平均年龄=22.4 岁,81.1% 女性)。效果大小为:SMD=0.08-0.53;对于抑郁症状;对于抑郁症,RR=0.90-0.28。仅包括随机对照试验的敏感性分析不影响结果。AMSTAR 中位数=9(IQR=8-9);AMSTAR-PLUS 含量中位数=4.25(IQR=4-5)。43 项 (93.5%) 荟萃分析的证据可信度不足/低,两项 (4.3%) 为中等,一项 (2.2%) 为高:仅对年轻人使用社会心理干预措施来减轻抑郁症状,并结合使用初级保健中的心理和教育干预措施具有中等可信度;选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)预防性给药治疗卒中患者的抑郁症具有很高的可信度。

局限性:干预异质性和缺乏长期疗效评估。

结论:抑郁症的初级预防干预可能是有效的。其中,临床医生可能会在卒中后提供 SSRI 以预防抑郁症,并为有危险因素的儿童/青少年/年轻人或在产前/围产期提供社会心理干预。

更新日期:2021-08-01
down
wechat
bug