This article examines the hospitality practices of pro-migrant civil society organisations in Istanbul. Drawing from qualitative interviews, we focus on intersecting gendered, professionalised and faith-based aspects of pro-migrant activities and explore the ways that politically and morally charged ambivalences of hospitality practices are articulated and negotiated. Moreover, by contextualising Turkey’s religious and geopolitical particularity as a gatekeeper of Europe, we work with Derrida’s concept of plural laws to investigate hospitality practices towards refugees in Istanbul. Civil actors’ intentions and attempts to be good citizens, Muslims, and care providers expose the intimate aspects of hospitality – a segue into discourses of displaced subjects’ (gendered) deservingness. By portraying how macro–micro, global–local and public–private relations condition hospitality practices, we observe how globalisation is lived intimately, influencing perceptions of deservingness and the prioritisation of displaced subjects’ needs.

本文考察了伊斯坦布尔亲移民民间社会组织的好客做法。通过定性访谈，我们重点关注亲移民活动的性别、专业化和基于信仰的交叉方面，并探索表达和协商酒店实践中政治和道德矛盾的方式。此外，通过将土耳其作为欧洲守门人的宗教和地缘政治特殊性进行背景化，我们与德里达的多元法律概念合作，调查伊斯坦布尔对难民的款待做法。公民行为者成为好公民、穆斯林和护理提供者的意图和尝试暴露了热情好客的私密方面 - 对流离失所者（性别）应得的话语的延续。通过描绘宏观和微观，