OBJECTIVE The insights of Latinx/@ immigrants are essential to developing interventions that better address complex multilevel phenomena impacting mental health. Despite important advances in methods that genuinely embody participatory research practices, attention to collaborative data collection, analysis, and dissemination are limited. Our aim is to describe the development and implementation of research practices to address these gaps through an emphasis on and understanding of the centrality of language in collaborative research processes. METHOD Guided from the outset by community-based participatory research principles, our community-academic research partnership recognized the importance of developing and intentionally studying our collaborative processes. As part of an ethnographic interview study with 24 Latinx/@ immigrants, a community-university research team developed innovative methods, including practices related to research team meetings, data collection, analysis, and dissemination, which we documented through ongoing discussion and reflection. RESULTS The resulting participatory research processes were grounded in a theoretical framework of praxis and language and included six innovative and iterative stages: (a) Establishing the research team, (b) planning the interview process/data collection, (c) developing the data analysis methodology, (d) interpreting findings to adapt the intervention, (e) integrating results of the participatory process into the analysis, and (f) data analysis for dissemination. CONCLUSIONS A focus on praxis and language revealed how the language of research structures' power, meaning, feeling, collaboration, analysis, and transformation. We also found that bilingual participatory analytic processes have important implications with respect to achieving genuine inclusion in rigorous research that moves toward equity for Latinx/@ immigrants and other populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

拉丁裔/@移民的创新参与式双语数据分析：语言、权力和转型。

目标 拉丁裔/@移民的见解对于制定干预措施至关重要，以更好地解决影响心理健康的复杂多层次现象。尽管真正体现参与式研究实践的方法取得了重要进展，但对协作数据收集、分析和传播的关注仍然有限。我们的目标是描述研究实践的发展和实施，通过强调和理解语言在协作研究过程中的中心地位来解决这些差距。方法 从一开始，我们的社区-学术研究伙伴关系就以基于社区的参与性研究原则为指导，认识到开发和有意识地研究我们的协作过程的重要性。作为对 24 名拉丁裔/@移民进行的民族志访谈研究的一部分，社区大学研究团队开发了创新方法，包括与研究团队会议、数据收集、分析和传播相关的实践，我们通过持续的讨论和反思记录了这些实践。结果 由此产生的参与式研究过程以实践和语言的理论框架为基础，包括六个创新和迭代阶段：(a) 建立研究团队，(b) 规划访谈过程/数据收集，(c) 开发数据分析方法，(d) 解释调查结果以调整干预措施，(e) 将参与过程的结果纳入分析，以及 (f) 数据分析以供传播。结论 对实践和语言的关注揭示了研究语言如何构建力量、意义、感觉、协作、分析、和转型。我们还发现，双语参与分析过程对于实现真正融入严谨的研究具有重要意义，从而实现拉丁裔/@移民和其他人群的公平。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA，保留所有权利）。