ABSTRACT

The present article extracts the normative and the crypto-normative from the polemical contexts in which they have been deployed as charges to study them in their more affirmative dimensions. Polemics increasingly contribute to a disabling dismissal of normativity that ultimately blocks nuanced re-conceptualizations of normative operations. Against this backdrop, the article attempts a first theorization of crypto-normativity as a concept in its own right independently from the Habermasian-Foucauldian polemics that initially framed it. However, instead of emerging as an escape route from normativity, crypto-normativity is defended as part and parcel of a broader set of normative “technologies” that assist human beings in their critical reshuffling of themselves and of their realities.

摘要

本文从争论的背景中提取规范和加密规范，在这些背景下，它们被部署为指控，以在更积极的维度上研究它们。论战越来越有助于对规范性的无能解雇，最终阻止对规范操作进行细微的重新概念化。在此背景下，本文尝试首次将密码规范性理论化为一个独立于最初构架它的哈贝马斯-福柯德论战的概念。然而，加密规范性并没有成为规范性的逃生路线，而是作为更广泛的规范性“技术”的一部分而被捍卫，这些规范性“技术”帮助人类批判性地重新洗牌自己和他们的现实。