当前位置: X-MOL 学术Circ. J. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Peri-Balloon Leak Flow Velocity Assessed by Intra-Cardiac Echography Predicts Pulmonary Vein Electrical Gap ― Intra-Cardiac Echography-Guided Contrast-Free Cryoballoon Ablation ―
Circulation Journal ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2022-01-25 , DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-21-0423
Atsushi Suzuki 1 , Ryudo Fujiwara 1 , Hiroyuki Asada 1 , Kohei Iwasa 1 , Tomohiro Miyata 1 , Woo Hyung Song 1 , Kotaro Higuchi 1 , Hidenobu Seo 1 , Yuki Sakamoto 1 , Masahiro Shimizu 1 , Fumitaka Soga 1 , Hiroyuki Shibata 1 , Amane Kozuki 1 , Ryoji Nagoshi 1 , H Immo Lehmann 2, 3 , Yoichi Kijima 1 , Junya Shite 1
Affiliation  

Background:The use of iodine contrast agents is one possible limitation in cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study investigated intracardiac echography (ICE)-guided contrast-free CBA.

Methods and Results:The study was divided into 2 phases. First, 25 paroxysmal AF patients (Group 1) underwent CBA, and peri-balloon leak flow velocity (PLFV) was assessed using ICE and electrical pulmonary vein (PV) lesion gaps were assessed by high-density electroanatomical mapping. Then, 24 patients (Group 2) underwent ICE-guided CBA and were compared with 25 patients who underwent conventional CBA (historical controls). In Group 1, there was a significant correlation between PLFV and electrical PV gap diameter (r=–0.715, P<0.001). PLFV was higher without than with an electrical gap (mean [±SD] 127.0±28.6 vs. 66.6±21.0 cm/s; P<0.001) and the cut-off value of PLFV to predict electrical isolation was 105.7 cm/s (sensitivity 0.700, specificity 0.929). In Group 2, ICE-guided CBA was successfully performed with acute electrical isolation of all PVs and without the need for “rescue” contrast injection. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at 6 months did not differ between ICE-guided and conventional CBA (3/24 [12.5%] vs. 5/25 [20.0%], respectively; P=0.973, log-rank test).

Conclusions:PLFV predicted the presence of an electrical PV gap after CBA. ICE-guided CBA was feasible and safe, and could potentially be performed completely contrast-free without a decrease in ablation efficacy.



中文翻译:

心内超声评估的球囊周围漏流速预测肺静脉电间隙 ― 心内超声引导的无对比冷冻球囊消融 ―

背景:碘造影剂的使用是心房颤动 (AF) 冷冻球囊消融 (CBA) 的一种可能限制。本研究调查了心内超声 (ICE) 引导的无造影剂 CBA。

方法和结果:该研究分为2个阶段。首先,25 名阵发性 AF 患者(第 1 组)接受 CBA,并使用 ICE 评估球囊周围泄漏流速(PLFV),并通过高密度电解剖标测评估电肺静脉(PV)病变间隙。然后,24 名患者(第 2 组)接受了 ICE 引导的 CBA,并与 25 名接受常规 CBA 的患者(历史对照)进行了比较。在第 1 组中,PLFV 与电 PV 间隙直径之间存在显着相关性(r=–0.715,P<0.001)。PLFV 在没有电气间隙的情况下高于没有电气间隙的情况(平均 [±SD] 127.0±28.6 vs. 66.6±21.0 cm/s; P<0.001),PLFV 预测电气隔离的截止值为 105.7 cm/s(灵敏度0.700,特异性 0.929)。在第 2 组中,ICE 引导的 CBA 成功地执行了所有 PV 的急性电隔离,并且无需“救援”造影剂注射。6 个月时房性快速心律失常复发在 ICE 引导和常规 CBA 之间没有差异(分别为 3/24 [12.5%] 和 5/25 [20.0%];P=0.973,对数秩检验)。

结论: PLFV 预测 CBA 后电 PV 间隙的存在。ICE 引导的 CBA 是可行且安全的,并且可能在不降低消融效果的情况下完全无造影剂进行。

更新日期:2022-01-25
down
wechat
bug