In this issue of JAMA Surgery, Schlick et al¹ characterize the gender discrimination and sexual harassment experienced by women vs men in surgical residency programs across the US. Although illuminating this mistreatment is undoubtedly important, there are 2 equally important topics that are missing from this work: (1) an analysis that fully encompasses the community of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, intersex, and asexual/allied individuals as well as those with other gender identities (LGBTQIA+) when investigating sexual orientation and gender identity and (2) a consideration of the racial and ethnic identities of the participants.

在本期JAMA Surgery 中，Schlick 等人¹描述了美国外科住院医师项目中女性与男性所经历的性别歧视和性骚扰。尽管阐明这种虐待无疑很重要，但这项工作缺少两个同样重要的主题：(1) 完全涵盖女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿/质疑、双性和无性恋/同盟的社区的分析在调查性取向和性别认同时，个人以及具有其他性别认同的人 (LGBTQIA+) 以及 (2) 考虑参与者的种族和民族认同。