The interactions among luggage carriers and free pedestrians would bring disorders and conflicts in traffic hubs. In this work, we experimentally study the effect of luggage-related facility layouts on conflict reduction among pedestrians by changing three variables: the movement conditions (walking and running), the passageway width and position for luggage-carriers. The main findings are as follows. (i) By analyzing egress time and flow rate, it is found that the movement efficiency in scenarios where the luggage passageway is in the right (middle) is 16.2% (13.6%) higher than that in scenarios where the luggage passageway is in the left. (ii) The offset distances of scenarios where the luggage passageway is in the right are always lower than that in others regardless of movement conditions (walking and running) and the luggage passageway width (1 m and 1.8 m). (iii) In the same scenario, non-luggage pedestrians overtake others more frequently than luggage carriers with a permutation test. The findings suggest that the luggage-related facilities placed in the middle or right of a passageway along pedestrian movement direction enhance traffic efficiency.

行李搬运工与自由行人的互动，会给交通枢纽带来混乱和冲突。在这项工作中，我们通过改变三个变量来实验研究行李相关设施布局对减少行人冲突的影响：移动条件（步行和跑步）、通道宽度和行李架位置。主要发现如下。(i) 通过分析出口时间和流量，发现行李通道在右侧（中）场景下的运动效率比行李通道在右侧（中）场景中的运动效率高 16.2%（13.6%）。左边。(ii) 不考虑移动条件（步行和跑步）和行李通道宽度（1 m和1.8 m），行李通道在右侧的场景的偏移距离始终小于其他场景。(iii) 在相同的情况下，通过置换测试，非行李行人比行李架更频繁地超越他人。研究结果表明，将行李相关设施沿行人移动方向放置在通道的中间或右侧，可提高通行效率。