To better understand exercise-related cognitive errors (ECEs) from a dual processing perspective, the purpose of this study was to examine their relationship to two automatic exercise processes. It was hypothesized that ECEs would account for more variance than automatic processes in predicting intentions, that ECEs would interact with automatic processes to predict intentions, and that exercise schema would distinguish between different levels of ECEs. Adults (N = 136, M_age = 29 years, 42.6% women) completed a cross-sectional study and responded to three survey measures (ECEs, exercise self-schema, and exercise intentions) and two computerized implicit tasks (the approach/avoid task and single-category Implicit Association Test). ECEs were not correlated with the two implicit measures; however, ECEs moderated the relationship between approach tendency toward exercise stimuli and exercise intentions. Exercise self-schema were differentiated by ECE level. This study expands our knowledge of ECEs by examining their relationship to different automatic and reflective processes.

为了从双重处理的角度更好地理解运动相关的认知错误 (ECE)，本研究的目的是检查它们与两个自动运动过程的关系。假设在预测意图方面，ECEs 比自动过程解释更多的差异，ECEs 将与自动过程交互以预测意图，并且练习模式将区分不同级别的 ECEs。成人 ( N  = 136, M_年龄 = 29 岁，42.6% 女性）完成了一项横断面研究，并对三项调查措施（ECE、锻炼自我模式和锻炼意图）和两项计算机化的内隐任务（接近/回避任务和单类别内隐联想测试）做出回应）。ECEs 与两个隐性指标不相关；然而，ECEs 缓和了运动刺激的趋近倾向和运动意图之间的关系。运动自我模式根据 ECE 水平进行区分。本研究通过检查 ECE 与不同自动和反思过程的关系，扩展了我们对 ECE 的了解。