Interest in the well-being measurement is constantly increasing worldwide, especially due to the Stiglitz Commission suggestions, which opened several questions about its assessment and theoretical framework. This paper focuses on the Italian scenario due to the central role given to this topic by the Italian Parliament, which introduces equitable and sustainable well-being among the objectives of the government’s economic and social policy. Significant differences exist among the proposed Italian well-being indices in terms of theoretical approach, statistical rigour and aims. We propose a detailed outline of these indices useful for policy-makers, practitioners, economists and statistics scholars, with the awareness that for a good analysis, a complete and conscious description of the data is the starting point to further improve their usefulness, to maximise their advantages and to cut down their limitations.

世界范围内对幸福感测量的兴趣不断增加，特别是由于斯蒂格利茨委员会的建议，这对其评估和理论框架提出了几个问题。由于意大利议会赋予该主题的核心作用，本文重点关注意大利情景，该主题将公平和可持续的福祉引入政府经济和社会政策的目标中。拟议的意大利幸福指数在理论方法、统计严谨性和目标方面存在显着差异。我们为政策制定者、从业者、经济学家和统计学学者提出了这些指数的详细概述，同时意识到要进行良好的分析，