In the recent article by Hugo et al. (2020), the word “ecloded” was incorrectly used. The correct term should have been “eclosed.” The error occurs three times throughout the text: in the Abstract, Section 2.5 in Material and Methods, and paragraph 4 of the Discussion. Also, in Section 2.4, the word “ecloding” should be changed to “eclosing”. The details are as follows:

Abstract

The sentence “Besides scientifically describing Montezumia termitophila sp. nov. (Vespidae: Eumeninae), named after its association with the termite Constrictotermes cyphergaster (Silvestri, 1901) (Termitidae: Nasutitermitinae), we provide preliminary information about the new species' bionomics by including (a) a hypothetical life cycle based on the evidence we collected and (b) a footage showing the first interaction between a recently ecloded wasp and a group of termites” should read “Besides scientifically describing Montezumia termitophila sp. nov. (Vespidae: Eumeninae), named after its association with the termite Constrictotermes cyphergaster (Silvestri, 1901) (Termitidae: Nasutitermitinae), we provide preliminary information about the new species' bionomics by including (a) a hypothetical life cycle based on the evidence we collected and (b) a footage showing the first interaction between a recently ecloded wasp and a group of termites.”

中文翻译：

---

更正

在 Hugo 等人最近的文章中。（2020 年），错误地使用了“ecloded”这个词。正确的术语应该是“eclosed”。该错误在全文中出现了 3 次：摘要、材料和方法的第 2.5 节和讨论的第 4 段。此外，在第 2.4 节中，“ecloding”一词应更改为“eclosure”。详细情况如下：

抽象的

这句话“除了科学地描述Montezumia termitophila sp. 十一月 (Vespidae: Eumeninae)，以其与白蚁Constrictotermes cyphergaster (Silvestri, 1901) (Termitidae: Nasutitermitinae) 的关联而命名，我们通过包括 (a) 基于我们的证据的假设生命周期来提供有关新物种生物组学的初步信息收集和 (b) 显示最近蜕皮的黄蜂和一群白蚁之间的第一次互动的镜头”应阅读“除了科学地描述Montezumia termitophila sp. 十一月 (Vespidae: Eumeninae)，以它与白蚁Constrictotermes cyphergaster 的关联命名 (Silvestri, 1901) (Termitidae: Nasutitermitinae)，我们提供了关于新物种生物组学的初步信息，包括 (a) 基于我们收集的证据的假设生命周期和 (b) 显示最近被繁殖的物种之间的第一次相互作用的镜头黄蜂和一群白蚁。”