Justice-involved youth experience high rates of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), placing them in great need of behavioral health treatment and risk for continued justice involvement. Policymakers, government agencies, and professionals working with justice-involved youth have called for trauma-informed juvenile justice reform. Yet, there is currently no available review of the literature on ACEs and their impact on justice-involved youths' psychological, legal, and related (e.g., academic) outcomes to rigorously guide such reform efforts. The current systematic scoping review synthesizes existing literature related to the impact of ACEs on justice-involved youth and offers recommendations for data-driven intervention along the Sequential Intercept Model, which describes five different points of justice system contact (i.e., first arrest, court diversion, detention, and community supervision) in which there is opportunity to intervene and improve youth behavioral health, legal, and associated outcomes. Eight unique studies were included in 40 articles examining ACEs among justice-involved youth; 38% were longitudinal or prospective analyses and none were intervention studies. Studies included delinquency (e.g., recidivism; n = 5), psychiatric (n = 4), substance use (n = 3), and other (n = 2; e.g., academic, pregnancy) outcomes, documenting high prevalence of ACEs and significant associations between ACEs and a variety of outcomes. Implications for clinical services (e.g., targeting youth dysregulation and aggression), agency context (e.g., training police officers in trauma-responsive practices), and system-level changes (e.g., intervening at the time of first ACE documentation such as parent's arrest) are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

参与司法的青年的不良童年经历：使用顺序截取模型的数据驱动的行动建议。

参与司法的青年经历了很高的不良童年经历 (ACE)，这使他们非常需要行为健康治疗，并面临继续参与司法的风险。政策制定者、政府机构和与参与司法的青年一起工作的专业人士呼吁进行创伤知情的少年司法改革。然而，目前还没有关于 ACE 及其对参与司法的青少年的心理、法律和相关（例如，学术）成果的影响的文献综述，以严格指导此类改革工作。当前的系统范围审查综合了与 ACE 对参与司法的青年的影响相关的现有文献，并为沿顺序拦截模型的数据驱动干预提供了建议，该模型描述了司法系统联系的五个不同点（即第一次逮捕、法庭转移、拘留和社区监督），其中有机会干预和改善青少年的行为健康、法律和相关结果。8 项独特的研究包含在 40 篇文章中，研究了参与司法的青年中的 ACE；38% 是纵向或前瞻性分析，没有一个是干预研究。研究包括犯罪（例如，累犯；n = 5）、精神病（n = 4）、物质使用（n = 3）和其他（n = 2；例如，学术、怀孕）结果，记录了 ACE 的高患病率和显着ACE 与各种结果之间的关联。对临床服务（例如，针对青少年失调和攻击行为）、机构环境（例如，培训警察进行创伤应对实践）和系统层面的变化（例如，在首次 ACE 文件（例如父母被捕）时进行干预）进行了讨论。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利）。