当前位置: X-MOL 学术Psychological Assessment › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Feasibility and acceptability of ecological momentary assessment in a fully online study of community-based adults at high risk for suicide.
Psychological Assessment ( IF 6.083 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-01 , DOI: 10.1037/pas0001054
Megan L Rogers 1
Affiliation  

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has increasingly been used to examine suicidality in naturalistic environments. Despite its potential to yield clinically relevant information, no EMA study has used an anonymous, fully online, design. This study reports on the feasibility and acceptability of real-time monitoring of suicide risk among 237 high-risk, anonymous, community-based adults (N = 237, 61.6% female, Mage = 27.12 years) who responded to six daily EMA prompts for 2 weeks. A subset (N = 69) completed a poststudy feedback survey to provide information on the acceptability of the study protocol. Response rates to EMA prompts (69.1%) demonstrated the feasibility of this design. Suicidal ideation was reported in 21.5% of prompts and by 86.1% of participants. Participants reported that their overall experience was positive, and that they would be willing to participate in a similar study again. Specific strengths and limitations of the study design were discussed in response to open-ended items. Finally, participants who created an alias email to ensure anonymity were less likely to report a suicide attempt (SA) history and more likely to complete the study. Overall, intensive EMA designs are feasible and acceptable when delivered online and to anonymous participants. Specific recommendations are provided for managing safety within these study designs, and for refinements in future work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

在一项针对自杀高危社区成人的完全在线研究中,生态瞬时评估的可行性和可接受性。

生态瞬时评估 (EMA) 越来越多地用于检查自然环境中的自杀行为。尽管有可能产生临床相关信息,但没有一项 EMA 研究使用匿名的、完全在线的设计。本研究报告了对 237 名高风险、匿名、社区成人(N = 237,61.6% 女性,法师 = 27.12 岁)进行自杀风险实时监测的可行性和可接受性,他们对每天 6 次 EMA 提示做出回应2周。一个子集 (N = 69) 完成了一项研究后反馈调查,以提供有关研究方案可接受性的信息。EMA 提示的响应率 (69.1%) 证明了这种设计的可行性。21.5% 的提示和 86.1% 的参与者报告了自杀意念。参与者报告说他们的整体体验是积极的,并且他们愿意再次参加类似的研究。针对开放式项目讨论了研究设计的具体优势和局限性。最后,创建别名电子邮件以确保匿名的参与者报告自杀企图 (SA) 历史的可能性较小,并且更有可能完成研究。总的来说,当在线交付给匿名参与者时,密集的 EMA 设计是可行和可接受的。为管理这些研究设计中的安全性以及未来工作的改进提供了具体建议。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。创建别名电子邮件以确保匿名的参与者报告自杀企图 (SA) 历史的可能性较小,并且更有可能完成研究。总的来说,当在线交付给匿名参与者时,密集的 EMA 设计是可行和可接受的。为管理这些研究设计中的安全性以及未来工作的改进提供了具体建议。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。创建别名电子邮件以确保匿名的参与者报告自杀企图 (SA) 历史的可能性较小,并且更有可能完成研究。总的来说,当在线交付给匿名参与者时,密集的 EMA 设计是可行和可接受的。为管理这些研究设计中的安全性以及未来工作的改进提供了具体建议。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2021-07-01
down
wechat
bug