OBJECTIVES Using the context of the Turkish-Kurdish conflict, Studies 1 and 2 tested how ethnic identification predicted support for minority rights through the pathway of the endorsement of the conflict narrative of the minority group (i.e., independence narrative) among Kurds (Study 1) and Turks (Study 2) in Turkey. Study 2 also tested whether the paths between (a) ethnic identification and endorsement of the minority group's conflict narrative and (b) endorsement of the minority group's conflict and support for minority rights would be moderated by ally identification (i.e., Turkish ally identification). METHODS 201 self-identified Kurdish participants in Study 1 and 271 self-identified Turkish participants in Study 2 participated in an online survey voluntarily. RESULTS In Study 1, stronger Kurdish identification predicted more support for minority rights through the pathway of more endorsement of the independence narrative. Study 2 showed the opposite findings with regard to the relationship between ethnic identification and support for minority rights. For the majority group, higher ethnic identification predicted less support for minority rights, through the pathway of less endorsement of the minority group's conflict narrative. Study 2 also found that the strength of the relationship between (a) ethnic identification and endorsement of the minority group's conflict narrative is particularly strong among strong allies, whereas the strength of the relationship between (b) endorsement of the minority group's conflict narrative and support for minority rights is particularly strong among weak allies. CONCLUSIONS Results point to the important relationship between ethnic and ally identities, conflict narratives, and intergroup-related outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

种族认同、盟友关系和冲突叙事在支持多数群体和少数群体中的亲少数政策方面的作用。

目标 利用土耳其-库尔德冲突的背景，研究 1 和 2 测试了种族认同如何通过库尔德人对少数群体冲突叙事（即独立叙事）的认可途径来预测对少数民族权利的支持（研究 1）和土耳其的土耳其人（研究 2）。研究 2 还测试了 (a) 种族认同和认可少数民族冲突叙述与 (b) 认可少数民族冲突和支持少数民族权利之间的路径是否会被盟友认同（即土耳其盟友认同）所调节。方法 研究 1 中 201 名自我认同为库尔德人的参与者和研究 2 中 271 名自我认同为土耳其人的参与者自愿参与在线调查。在研究 1 中的结果，更强的库尔德认同预示着通过更多地支持独立叙事的途径对少数民族权利的更多支持。研究 2 在民族认同与支持少数民族权利之间的关系方面显示了相反的结果。对于多数群体而言，较高的种族认同预示着对少数群体权利的支持较少，这是通过对少数群体冲突叙事的较少认可这一途径实现的。研究 2 还发现，(a) 种族认同和支持少数群体冲突叙事之间的关系强度在强大的盟友中尤为强烈，而 (b) 支持少数群体冲突叙事和支持之间的关系强度因为少数人的权利在弱小的盟友中尤为强大。结论 结果指出种族和盟友身份、冲突叙述和群体间相关结果之间的重要关系。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。