Background: The Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality (STARS) is a client-centered, psychosocial needs-based assessment protocol. This semistructured interview obtains client prioritized indicators that contribute to suicidality and informs commensurate care responses for preventing suicide. Aim: To pilot the feasibility, client-centeredness, and usability of the STARS protocol, including clinicians' perceptions of ease of use; content validity; and administration within the community setting. Method: A convenience sample of clinicians who undertook assessment and/or intervention with suicidal persons and had used STARS between mid-2016 and early 2017 completed an online survey assessing feasibility, client-centeredness, and usability of STARS. Results: Of the 51 clinicians who entered the survey, 42 (82.3%; aged 25-74; 69% female) completed it. Overall, perceptions of feasibility and usability of STARS were positive, particularly regarding client-centeredness of the protocol and confidence in information obtained for screening suicidality and informing needs-based priority responses. Limitations: The pilot findings are limited by the use of a small convenience sample and the low completion rate of clinicians with STARS training. Conclusion: STARS was perceived as a feasible and useful psychosocial needs-based assessment protocol. Suggestions for improving STARS, training requirements, and application to diverse populations are outlined.

中文翻译：

---

一项关于临床医生对响应自杀协议的系统定制评估的可行性、以客户为中心和可用性的看法的初步研究。

背景：针对自杀反应的系统定制评估 (STARS) 是一种以客户为中心、基于社会心理需求的评估方案。这种半结构化访谈获得了客户优先考虑的有助于自杀的指标，并为预防自杀提供了相应的护理反应。目的：试验 STARS 协议的可行性、以客户为中心和可用性，包括临床医生对易用性的看法；内容效度；和社区环境中的管理。方法：在 2016 年年中至 2017 年初期间对自杀者进行评估和/或干预并使用过 STARS 的临床医生的便利样本完成了一项评估 STARS 的可行性、以客户为中心和可用性的在线调查。结果：在参与调查的 51 名临床医生中，42 名（82.3%；年龄 25-74 岁；69% 的女性）完成了它。总的来说，对 STARS 的可行性和可用性的看法是积极的，特别是关于协议以客户为中心以及对获得的用于筛查自杀和告知基于需求的优先响应的信息的信心。局限性：试点结果受到使用小样本和接受 STARS 培训的临床医生完成率低的限制。结论：STARS 被认为是一种可行且有用的基于社会心理需求的评估方案。概述了改进 STARS、培训要求和应用于不同人群的建议。特别是关于该协议以客户为中心以及对获得的用于筛查自杀和告知基于需求的优先响应的信息的信心。局限性：试点结果受到使用小样本和接受 STARS 培训的临床医生完成率低的限制。结论：STARS 被认为是一种可行且有用的基于社会心理需求的评估方案。概述了改进 STARS、培训要求和应用于不同人群的建议。特别是关于该协议以客户为中心以及对获得的用于筛查自杀和告知基于需求的优先响应的信息的信心。局限性：试点结果受到使用小样本和接受 STARS 培训的临床医生完成率低的限制。结论：STARS 被认为是一种可行且有用的基于社会心理需求的评估方案。概述了改进 STARS、培训要求和应用于不同人群的建议。