当前位置: X-MOL 学术Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Experimental Effect of Parent Versus Peer Influence on Children's Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.
Pediatric Exercise Science ( IF 1.8 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-24 , DOI: 10.1123/pes.2020-0149
Mallory Kobak 1, 2 , Andrew Lepp 1 , Michael Rebold 1, 2 , Ellen Glickman 1 , Jacob E Barkley 1
Affiliation  

PURPOSE To assess children's physical activity, sedentary behavior, liking, and motivation during 3 separate simulated recess conditions: playing alone, with their parent participating, and with their peer participating. METHODS Children participated in the 3 separate conditions. During each condition, the children had access to an outdoor playground and sedentary activity options for 30 minutes. Accelerometry recorded the physical activity. Time allocated to sedentary options was monitored via a stopwatch. A visual analog scale was used to assess liking, and motivation was assessed as the children's willingness to participate in an additional 10 minutes of each condition. RESULTS The children sat 88% less and were 33% more physically active with their peer versus playing alone. The children also sat 65% less during the parent condition than alone. Lastly, the children reported ≥34% liking and were ≥2-fold more likely to participate in the additional 10-minute activity bout during the parent and peer conditions than alone. The differences were significant (P ≤ .05) except for the children's decision to participate in the additional 10 minutes in the parent versus the alone condition (P = .058). CONCLUSIONS Relative to the alone condition, the presence of a peer or parent reduced sedentary behavior and increased liking and the motivation to participate in that condition. However, only the presence of a peer increased physical activity versus alone.

中文翻译:

父母对同伴影响对儿童体育活动和久坐行为的实验效果。

目的 评估儿童在 3 种不同的模拟课间休息条件下的身体活动、久坐行为、喜好和动机:独自玩耍、父母参与和同伴参与。方法 儿童参与了 3 个不同的条件。在每种情况下,孩子们都可以使用室外游乐场和 30 分钟的久坐活动选项。加速度计记录了身体活动。通过秒表监控分配给久坐选项的时间。视觉模拟量表用于评估喜好,动机被评估为儿童参与每种条件额外 10 分钟的意愿。结果 与单独玩耍相比,与同龄人一起玩的孩子少坐了 88%,体育活动多 33%。孩子们在父母条件下的坐姿也比单独坐少 65%。最后,孩子们报告了 ≥34% 的喜欢,并且在父母和同伴条件下参与额外 10 分钟活动的可能性是单独的 ≥2 倍。差异是显着的 (P ≤ .05),除了孩子们决定在父母和单独条件下参加额外的 10 分钟 (P = .058)。结论 相对于单独的情况,同伴或父母的存在减少了久坐行为,增加了喜欢和参与这种情况的动机。然而,与单独相比,只有同伴的存在增加了身体活动。孩子们报告了 ≥34% 的喜欢,并且在父母和同伴条件下参与额外 10 分钟活动的可能性是单独的 2 倍以上。差异是显着的 (P ≤ .05),除了孩子们决定在父母和单独条件下参加额外的 10 分钟 (P = .058)。结论 相对于单独的情况,同伴或父母的存在减少了久坐行为,增加了喜欢和参与这种情况的动机。然而,与单独相比,只有同伴的存在增加了身体活动。孩子们报告了 ≥34% 的喜欢,并且在父母和同伴条件下参与额外 10 分钟活动的可能性是单独的 2 倍以上。差异是显着的 (P ≤ .05),除了孩子们决定在父母和单独条件下参加额外的 10 分钟 (P = .058)。结论 相对于单独的情况,同伴或父母的存在减少了久坐行为,增加了喜欢和参与这种情况的动机。然而,与单独相比,只有同伴的存在增加了身体活动。同伴或父母的存在减少了久坐行为,增加了喜欢和参与这种情况的动力。然而,与单独相比,只有同伴的存在增加了身体活动。同伴或父母的存在减少了久坐行为,增加了喜欢和参与这种情况的动力。然而,与单独相比,只有同伴的存在增加了身体活动。
更新日期:2021-06-24
down
wechat
bug