Bail is one of the most powerful non-custodial tools which the authorities administer very cautiously, taking into account the interests of both parties to the case in particular and the safety of the society in general. The monitoring mechanisms attached to the bail-bonds play an essential role in this context. In Pakistan, the law offers very few mechanisms to monitor the person released on bail; this paucity of options sometimes poses the rights of parties to the case at risk. Despite being a subject of high significance, this issue has failed to receive due attention from the Pakistani legislature and the judiciary. The content of this assertion is evident from very outdated law and restricted judicial interpretations on this point. This state of affairs direly calls for change in the judicial attitude which does not seem possible without amending the existing law on bail. For this purpose, this paper conducts an inquiry into the Indian and the English legal regimes on bail. The research finally proposes enhancement and intensification of the surveillance strategies through the utilization of the Indian law on bail to insert additional monitoring mechanisms place-able especially against the bail-seeker. It further suggests that the judiciary should have clear discretion to impose every suitable monitoring mechanism on the pattern of English law against the bail-seeker.

中文翻译：

---

巴基斯坦保释监督机制不完善：对当事人权利保护的挑战

保释是当局非常谨慎地管理的最强大的非监禁工具之一，特别是考虑到案件双方的利益以及整个社会的安全。附加在保释金上的监督机制在这方面发挥着重要作用。在巴基斯坦，法律很少提供对保释人员进行监督的机制；这种选择的缺乏有时会使案件当事方的权利处于危险之中。尽管这个问题具有重要意义，但巴基斯坦立法机关和司法机关并未对这一问题给予应有的重视。这一主张的内容从非常过时的法律和在这一点上受到限制的司法解释中可见一斑。这种情况迫切需要改变司法态度，如果不修改现行的保释法，这似乎是不可能的。为此，本文对印度和英国的保释法律制度进行了调查。该研究最终建议通过利用印度保释法来加强和强化监控策略，以插入额外的监控机制，尤其是针对寻求保释者的监控机制。它进一步建议司法机关应有明确的自由裁量权，根据英国法律的模式对寻求保释者施加一切适当的监督机制。该研究最终建议通过利用印度保释法来加强和强化监控策略，以插入额外的监控机制，尤其是针对寻求保释者的监控机制。它进一步建议司法机关应有明确的自由裁量权，根据英国法律的模式对寻求保释者施加一切适当的监督机制。该研究最终建议通过利用印度保释法来加强和强化监控策略，以插入额外的监控机制，尤其是针对寻求保释者的监控机制。它进一步建议司法机关应有明确的自由裁量权，根据英国法律的模式对寻求保释者施加一切适当的监督机制。