当前位置: X-MOL 学术Kantian Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Freedom from Autonomy: An Essay on Accountability
Kantian Review Pub Date : 2020-12-04 , DOI: 10.1017/s1369415420000370
Brian O’connor

Neo-Kantian philosophers see accountability as a key property of autonomy, or of social freedom more broadly. Autonomy, among those theorists, is, I contend, implicitly co-conceived with responsibility, producing a quasi-juridical conception of autonomy and a limiting notion of freedom. This article criticizes the connecting of freedom with accountability on a number of grounds. First, various conceptions of autonomy not only operate without a notion of accountability, but, in fact, would be impaired by an accountability requirement. Second, the neo-Kantians are unable to defend the freedom enhancing properties that are supposedly brought about by the giving of reasons for one’s beliefs and actions. Third, the project of accountability is indifferent to personal outlooks, not because it takes a holistic perspective, but because of its interest in social convergence.

中文翻译:

摆脱自治:关于问责制的论文

新康德主义哲学家将问责制视为自主或更广泛的社会自由的关键属性。我认为,在这些理论家中,自治是与责任隐含地共同构想的,产生了一种准司法的自治概念和一种限制性的自由概念。本文基于多种理由批评了自由与问责制的联系。首先,各种自治概念不仅在没有问责制概念的情况下运作,而且实际上会受到问责制要求的损害。其次,新康德主义者无法捍卫所谓的自由增强特性,这些特性是由给出一个人的信仰和行为的理由所带来的。第三,问责项目与个人观点无关,不是因为它采取整体观点,
更新日期:2020-12-04
down
wechat
bug