当前位置: X-MOL 学术GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
THE ONTOLOGY OF THE COUPLE
GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies ( IF 0.816 ) Pub Date : 2019-04-01 , DOI: 10.1215/10642684-7367717
S. Pearl Brilmyer , Filippo Trentin , Zairong Xiang

Abstract:This essay excavates from within the history of feminist and queer theory a series of implicit theories of the couple, ranging from French feminist critiques of asymmetrical heterosexual relationships to triadic accounts of the queer as couple's sexual and racialized Other. We turn to four integers—one, two, three, and zero—to comprehend the shifting relationship between the Couple and the Queer, constructing a queer numerology that attends to the numerical patterns that can be said to characterize coupled relationality in different historical moments. Taking cues from Lee Edelman as well as recent Afro-pessimist scholarship, we approach the Couple not as a sociological category, but as a structure of being, and the Queer, not as an identitarian category but as an (non)ontological position. Drawing from a diverse archive of texts from 1970s Italian feminism to Daoist philosophy to early psychoanalytic theories of the anus, we take a step back from the post-structural logic that has animated queer studies since its inception, developing a structuralist methodology that insists on the ontological and ethical significance of the position we call the zero.

中文翻译:

这对夫妇的本体论

摘要:本文从女权主义和酷儿理论的历史中挖掘出一系列关于夫妻的隐含理论,从法国女权主义对不对称异性恋关系的批评到将酷儿作为夫妻的性和种族化他者的三重解释。我们转向四个整数——一、二、三和零——来理解夫妻和酷儿之间的变化关系,构建一个酷儿命理学,关注可以说是表征不同历史时刻耦合关系的数字模式。从 Lee Edelman 和最近的非裔悲观主义奖学金中汲取灵感,我们不是将夫妻视为社会学类别,而是将其视为存在结构,而酷儿则不是作为身份认同类别,而是作为(非)本体论立场。
更新日期:2019-04-01
down
wechat
bug