当前位置: X-MOL 学术British Journal of Social Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Racism and misrecognition
British Journal of Social Psychology ( IF 6.920 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-15 , DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12480
Yarong Xie 1 , Steve Kirkwood 1 , Eric Laurier 1 , Sue Widdicombe 1
Affiliation  

Recognition and misrecognition have been theorized as key concepts for social justice. Misrecognition involves being disrespected or labelled in ways which do not accord with a person’s self-identify. Racism can be understood as a specific form of misrecognition but little research has explored this form or drawn on notions of misrecognition in the discursive psychological study of racism. Our study addresses this gap by drawing on discursive psychology and conversation analysis to examine reports of racial encounters in public spaces, where misrecognition of the targets’ nationality is invoked. We demonstrate that instances of misrecognition are judged as racism through the selection and use of categories and/or category-sensitive predicates that exclude the target of them from (national) category membership to which they claim entitlement. People reporting racialized encounters and those responding to them treat the description and evaluation of such incidents sensitively, orienting to the delicacy of alleging racism. In this article, we enhance theoretical understandings of misrecognition by showing how it is constructed interactionally and demonstrate the value of notions of recognition and misrecognition for the study of racism.

中文翻译:

种族主义和误认

承认和误认已被理论化为社会正义的关键概念。误认包括被不尊重或以不符合个人自我认同的方式贴上标签。种族主义可以被理解为一种特定形式的误认,但很少有研究探索这种形式或在种族主义的话语心理学研究中借鉴误认的概念。我们的研究通过利用话语心理学和对话分析来检查公共场所种族遭遇的报告来解决这一差距,在公共场所,对目标国籍的误认被援引。我们证明,通过选择和使用类别和/或类别敏感谓词将他们的目标排除在他们声称有权加入的(国家)类别成员之外,误认的实例被判断为种族主义。报告种族化遭遇的人和回应他们的人会敏感地对待此类事件的描述和评估,指向指控种族主义的微妙之处。在本文中,我们通过展示错误识别如何交互构建来增强对错误识别的理论理解,并展示识别和错误识别概念对种族主义研究的价值。
更新日期:2021-07-15
down
wechat
bug