The market power and competition scenario of recycling enterprises and landfills may change in the future due to the environmental pressure caused by landfills and the environmental potential of construction and demolition waste (C&DW) recycling. In this context, how these changes will affect the economic performance of enterprises and the environmental performance of the whole society remains unclear, along with how the willingness to pay and the environmental awareness of contractors will affect the pricing decisions of recycling enterprises and landfills. This study investigates the charging and recycling problem under different power structures in the reverse supply chain of C&DW, which is composed of waste generators (construction contractors) and two disposers (recycling enterprises and landfills). The interactive decisions of three stakeholders are discussed and the optimal charge fee, profit, and recycling ratio are obtained. Results indicate the following (i) The environmental preference of contractors directly increases the charge fee of recycling enterprises, and indirectly increases the charge fee of landfills. (ii) An increase in contractors’ environmental preference will reduce the recycling ratio of C&DW and increase landfill and illegal dumping ratios. (iii) From the perspective of environmental benefits, illegal dumping and recycling ratios experience the worst scenario in the Recycling-Stackelberg game model and the best scenario in Nash game model because recycling enterprises take advantage of their dominant market position and set higher charges than those that contractors can afford. This theoretical study bridges the research gap on the effects of the market power on the environmental and economic performance of stakeholders in the field of C&DW management. The findings also help policy makers understand the behavior of stakeholders under different power structures to formulate the most effective intervention strategies.

由于垃圾填埋场带来的环境压力以及建筑和拆迁废物（C&DW）回收利用的环境潜力，未来回收企业和垃圾填埋场的市场力量和竞争格局可能会发生变化。在此背景下，这些变化将如何影响企业的经济绩效和全社会的环境绩效，以及承包商的支付意愿和环保意识将如何影响回收企业和垃圾填埋场的定价决策，尚不清楚。本研究调查了由废物产生者（建筑承包商）和两个处置者（回收企业和垃圾填埋场）组成的 C&DW 逆向供应链中不同电力结构下的充电和回收问题。讨论了三个利益相关者的交互决策，并获得了最优的收费、利润和回收率。结果表明：（i）承包商的环保偏好直接增加了回收企业的收费，间接增加了垃圾填埋场的收费。(ii) 承建商环保偏好的增加会降低拆建废弃物的回收率，并增加垃圾填埋和非法倾倒的比率。(iii) 从环境效益的角度来看，非法倾倒和回收率在 Recycling-Stackelberg 博弈模型中经历了最坏的情况，在 Nash 博弈模型中出现了最好的情况，因为回收企业利用其市场支配地位，收取比后者更高的费用承包商可以负担得起。这项理论研究弥合了市场力量对 C&DW 管理领域利益相关者环境和经济绩效影响的研究空白。研究结果还有助于决策者了解不同权力结构下利益相关者的行为，以制定最有效的干预策略。