当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. J. Sports Sci. Coaching › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Effects of 4-week small-sided games vs. high-intensity interval training with changes of direction in female collegiate basketball players
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching ( IF 2.029 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-13 , DOI: 10.1177/17479541211032739
Jinshu Zeng 1 , Jing Xu 1 , Yuanhong Xu 1 , Wu Zhou 1 , Fei Xu 1, 2
Affiliation  

The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of 4-week small-sided games (SSG) and high-intensity interval training with changes of direction (HIT-COD) on physical performance and specific technical skills in female collegiate basketball players.

Nineteen players were divided into SSG (n = 9) and HIT-COD (n = 10) groups, that performed either SSG or HIT-COD three times per week for 4 weeks during the pre-season. Players’ heart rate (HR) and perceived exertion responses (RPE) were assessed during the intervention. Before and after the intervention period, performances were assessed with 30-15 intermittent fitness test (30-15IFT), repeated sprint ability (RSA) test, modified agility T-test (MAT), countermovement jump (CMJ), 20-m sprint, shooting accuracy test, 1 min shooting test, passing test, defensive movement test and control dribble test.

Both training interventions led to similar physiological and perceived exertion responses, showing no significant differences in HR (P = .49, d = 0.2) and RPE (P = .77, d = 0.1) between groups. Significant improvements were observed in 30-15IFT (SSG: 4.1%, d = 1.5; HIT-COD: 4.2%, d = 1.7), RSAmean (SSG: −2.2%, d = 1.0; HIT-COD: −1.9%, d = 1.0), RSAbest (SSG: −2.0%, d = 0.9; HIT-COD: −2.1%, d = 1.1), MAT (SSG: −7.2%, d = 1.7; HIT-COD: 5.7%, d = 1.5), defensive movement test (SSG: −5.1%, d = 2.1; HIT-COD: −5.8%, d = 1.8) and control dribble test (SSG: −3.4%, d = 1.0; HIT-COD: −2.6%, d = 1.0). The only significant group × time interaction was found (P = .032, ηp2 = 0.24), with SSG improving 1 min shooting (22.4%, d = 1.0) and HIT-COD performing slightly worse (−2.6%, d = 0.1) after a 4-week intervention.

The current study suggests that using SSG is more effective than HIT-COD for female collegiate basketball players in pre-season, since SSG improves physical performance and basketball-specific movements as well as shooting abilities after a 4-week intervention.



中文翻译:

4周小场比赛与高强度间歇训练对女大学生篮球运动员方向变化的影响

该研究的目的是调查为期 4 周的小场比赛 (SSG) 和高强度间歇训练与方向变化 (HIT-COD) 对女大学生篮球运动员的身体表现和特定技术技能的影响。

19 名球员被分为 SSG (n = 9) 和 HIT-COD (n = 10) 组,在季前赛期间每周进行 3 次 SSG 或 HIT-COD,持续 4 周。在干预期间评估了球员的心率 (HR) 和感知的劳累反应 (RPE)。在干预期前后,通过30-15间歇性体能测试(30-15 IFT)、重复冲刺能力(RSA)测试、改良敏捷性T测试(MAT)、反向跳跃(CMJ)、20米冲刺、投篮精准度测试、1分钟投篮测试、传球测试、防守动作测试和控制运球测试。

两种训练干预都导致了相似的生理和感知用力反应,显示组间 HR ( P  = .49, d  = 0.2) 和 RPE ( P  = .77, d  = 0.1)没有显着差异。在 30-15 IFT中观察到显着改善(SSG:4.1%,d  = 1.5;HIT-COD:4.2%,d  = 1.7),RSA平均值(SSG:-2.2%,d  = 1.0;HIT-COD:-1.9 %,d  = 1.0),RSA最佳(SSG:-2.0%,d  = 0.9;HIT-COD:-2.1%,d  = 1.1),MAT(SSG:-7.2%,d  = 1.7;HIT-COD:5.7 %, d = 1.5)、防守运动测试(SSG:-5.1%,d  = 2.1;HIT-COD:-5.8%,d  = 1.8)和控制运球测试(SSG:-3.4%,d  = 1.0;HIT-COD:- 2.6%,d  = 1.0)。发现唯一显着的组×时间交互作用(P  = .032,η2 = 0.24), 在 4 周的干预后,SSG 提高了 1 分钟射击(22.4%,d  = 1.0)和 HIT-COD 表现稍差(-2.6%,d = 0.1)。

目前的研究表明,对于女大学生篮球运动员在季前赛中使用 SSG 比 HIT-COD 更有效,因为 SSG 在 4 周的干预后提高了身体表现和篮球特定的动作以及投篮能力。

更新日期:2021-07-13
down
wechat
bug