ABSTRACT

In this special issue response paper, we pick up from prior discussions to suggest areas where we think policy sociology can benefit from further conversation and research. In particular, we bring together our respective readings and work on policy mobilities, in conversation with the contributions of this special issue, to think further about what policy mobilities and related orientations can bring to the development of policy sociology. We specifically focus our attention on four areas for further conceptual and methodological extension in relation to policy mobilities and related approaches in policy sociology of education: (i) temporality, (ii) scale, (iii) land, and, finally, (iv) methodological diversity. In doing so, we advocate against ‘fast’ readings of literature from other fields, while emphasizing the value of transdisciplinary work in policy sociology and critical policy studies.

摘要

在这篇特刊回应论文中，我们从之前的讨论中挑选出我们认为政策社会学可以从进一步的对话和研究中受益的领域。特别是，我们将各自在政策流动性方面的阅读和工作结合起来，与本期特刊的贡献进行对话，以进一步思考政策流动性和相关方向可以为政策社会学的发展带来什么。我们特别关注与教育政策社会学的政策流动性和相关方法相关的进一步概念和方法论扩展的四个领域：（i）时间性，（ii）规模，（iii）土地，最后，（iv）方法论多样性。在这样做时，我们主张反对“快速”阅读其他领域的文学作品，