Uncertainties of collapse susceptibility prediction based on remote sensing and GIS: effects of different machine learning models,Frontiers in Earth Science

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Front. Earth Sci. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Uncertainties of collapse susceptibility prediction based on remote sensing and GIS: effects of different machine learning models
Frontiers in Earth Science ( IF 2.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-12 , DOI: 10.3389/feart.2021.731058
Wenbin Li , Yu Shi , Faming Huang , Haoyuan Hong , Guquan Song

For the issue of collapse susceptibility prediction (CSP), minimal attention has been paid to explore the uncertainty characteristics of different machine learning models predicting collapse susceptibility. In this study, six kinds of typical machine learning methods, namely, logistic regression (LR), radial basis function (RBF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector machine (SVM), chi-square automatic interactive detection decision tree (CHAID) and random forest (RF) models, are constructed to do CSP. In this regard, An’yuan County in China, with a total of 108 collapses and 11 related environmental factors acquired through remote sensing and GIS technologies, is selected as a case study. The spatial data set is firstly constructed, and then these machine learning models are used to implement CSP. Finally, the uncertainty characteristics of the CSP results are explored according to the accuracies, mean values and standard deviations of the collapse susceptibility indexes (CSIs) and the Kendall synergy coefficient test. In addition, Huichang County, China is used as another study case to avoid the uncertainty of different study areas. Results show that, 1) Overall, all six kinds of machine learning models reasonably and accurately predict the collapse susceptibility in An’yuan County; 2) The RF model has the highest prediction accuracy, followed by the CHAID, SVM, MLP, RBF and LR models; 3) The CSP results of these models are significantly different, with the mean value (0.2718) and average rank (2.72) of RF being smaller than those of the other five models, followed by the CHAID (0.3210 and 3.29), SVM (0.3268 and 3.48), MLP (0.3354 and 3.64), RBF (0.3449 and 3.81) and LR (0.3496 and 4.06), and with a Kendall synergy coefficient value of 0.062. Conclusively, it is necessary to adopt a series of different machine learning models to predict collapse susceptibility for cross-validation and comparison. Furthermore, the RF model has the highest prediction accuracy and the lowest uncertainty of the CSP results of the machine learning models.

更新日期：2021-07-12

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

公开下载

阅读更多本刊最新论文

全部期刊列表>>