This article extends theories on varieties of gender regimes by arguing for the significance of property. Drawing on the case study of Turkey, it proposes that gendered property ownership diversifies patriarchal relations of labor. This historical-sociology-based case study method is used to differentiate two forms of domestic patriarchy: premodern and modern. In premodern domestic patriarchy, women’s exclusion from agricultural landownership, in conjunction with the dominance of small landownership, sustains the patriarchal exploitation of labor in agriculture. In modern domestic patriarchy, women’s exclusion from paid employment, along with dispossession and increasing wage dependency, maintains the patriarchal exploitation of labor within the home.

中文翻译：

---

为什么房产很重要？土耳其国内父权制的新变化

本文通过论证财产的重要性来扩展关于各种性别制度的理论。借鉴土耳其的案例研究，它提出性别财产所有权使劳动的父权关系多样化。这种基于历史社会学的案例研究方法用于区分国内父权制的两种形式：前现代和现代。在前现代家庭父权制中，妇女被排除在农业土地所有权之外，再加上小土地所有权的主导地位，维持了农业劳动的父权式剥削。在现代家庭父权制中，女性被排除在有偿就业之外，以及剥夺和日益增加的工资依赖，维持了家庭内劳动力的父权剥削。