Purpose

The purpose of this study is to present findings of an approval plan assessment project, which analyzed circulation statistics for four Gobi Select designations: research essential, research recommended, basic essential and basic recommended.

Design/methodology/approach

This study approaches approval plan assessment by analyzing three years of circulation statistics to determine which, if any, of the Gobi Select designations circulated the most.

Findings

This study reveals that books designated as “basic essential” have circulated at higher rates than other designations.

Originality/value

To the best of the author’s knowledge, no other studies have made use of Gobi Select designations to analyze circulation statistics for books obtained on an approval plan.

中文翻译：

---

顾客在使用研究书籍吗？审批计划评估的新方法

目的

本研究的目的是展示批准计划评估项目的结果，该项目分析了四个戈壁精选名称的流通统计数据：研究必要、研究推荐、基本必要和基本推荐。

设计/方法/方法

本研究通过分析三年的流通统计数据来确定批准计划评估，以确定哪些 Gobi Select 指定（如果有）流通最多。

发现

这项研究表明，被指定为“基本必需品”的书籍的流通率高于其他指定书籍。

原创性/价值

据作者所知，没有其他研究使用戈壁精选名称来分析通过批准计划获得的图书的发行量统计数据。