当前位置: X-MOL 学术Learned Publishing › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness
Learned Publishing ( IF 2.711 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-06 , DOI: 10.1002/leap.1409
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva 1 , Quan‐Hoang Vuong 2, 3
Affiliation  

  • Retraction notices (RNs) are historical documents and must be as informative as possible to ensure the scholarly record is complete.
  • RNs must be complete, informative, open, transparent, and comprehensive, and must include clear indication of fault and responsibility.
  • A guideline about what RNs should or should not contain will help to ensure consistency and completeness.
  • Declarations-related retractions can be prevented by conducting a thorough check in the initial quality check.
  • The issuer of the RN should be named in the notice, and may include the name of research institutions and funders if necessary.
  • To ensure complete transparency, RNs should include details of any investigation that supported the decision.


中文翻译:

强化撤回通知以提高其透明度和实用性

  • 撤稿通知 (RN) 是历史文件,必须尽可能提供信息以确保学术记录完整。
  • RN 必须完整、信息丰富、公开、透明和全面,并且必须包括对错误和责任的明确指示。
  • 关于 RN 应该或不应该包含什么的指南将有助于确保一致性和完整性。
  • 通过在初始质量检查中进行彻底检查,可以防止与声明相关的撤回。
  • RN的发行人应在通知中注明,必要时可包括研究机构和资助者的名称。
  • 为确保完全透明,注册护士应包括支持该决定的任何调查的详细信息。
更新日期:2021-07-06
down
wechat
bug