当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Air Transport Management › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Network-wide assessment of ATM mechanisms using an agent-based model
Journal of Air Transport Management ( IF 5.428 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-06 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102108
Luis Delgado 1 , Gérald Gurtner 1 , Piero Mazzarisi 2 , Silvia Zaoli 2 , Damir Valput 3 , Andrew Cook 1 , Fabrizio Lillo 2
Affiliation  

This paper presents results from the SESAR ER3 Domino project. Three mechanisms are assessed at the ECAC-wide level: 4D trajectory adjustments (a combination of actively waiting for connecting passengers and dynamic cost indexing), flight prioritisation (enabling ATFM slot swapping at arrival regulations), and flight arrival coordination (where flights are sequenced in extended arrival managers based on an advanced cost-driven optimisation). Classical and new metrics, designed to capture network effects, are used to analyse the results of a micro-level agent-based model. A scenario with congestion at three hubs is used to assess the 4D trajectory adjustment and the flight prioritisation mechanisms. Two different scopes for the extended arrival manager are modelled to analyse the impact of the flight arrival coordination mechanism. Results show that the 4D trajectory adjustments mechanism succeeds in reducing costs and delays for connecting passengers. A trade-off between the interests of the airlines in reducing costs and those of non-connecting passengers emerges, although passengers benefit overall from the mechanism. Flight prioritisation is found to have no significant effects at the network level, as it is applied to a small number of flights. Advanced flight arrival coordination, as implemented, increases delays and costs in the system. The arrival manager optimises the arrival sequence of all flights within its scope but does not consider flight uncertainties, thus leading to sub-optimal actions.



中文翻译:

使用基于代理的模型对 ATM 机制进行全网评估

本文介绍了 SESAR ER3 Domino 项目的结果。在 ECAC 范围内评估了三种机制:4D 轨迹调整(积极等待转机乘客和动态成本索引的组合)、航班优先级(在到达规定时启用 ATFM 时隙交换)和航班到达协调(对航班进行排序)在基于高级成本驱动优化的扩展到达管理器中)。旨在捕捉网络效应的经典和新指标用于分析基于代理的微观模型的结果。三个枢纽拥堵的场景用于评估 4D 轨迹调整和飞行优先级机制。对扩展到达管理器的两个不同范围进行建模,以分析航班到达协调机制的影响。结果表明,4D 轨迹调整机制成功地降低了连接乘客的成本和延误。航空公司在降低成本方面的利益与非转机乘客的利益之间出现了一种权衡,尽管乘客总体上从该机制中受益。发现航班优先级在网络级别没有显着影响,因为它应用于少量航班。实施的高级航班抵达协调会增加系统中的延误和成本。到达管理器在其范围内优化所有航班的到达顺序,但不考虑航班的不确定性,从而导致次优动作。航空公司在降低成本方面的利益与非转机乘客的利益之间出现了一种权衡,尽管乘客总体上从该机制中受益。发现航班优先级在网络级别没有显着影响,因为它应用于少量航班。实施的高级航班抵达协调会增加系统中的延误和成本。到达管理器在其范围内优化所有航班的到达顺序,但不考虑航班的不确定性,从而导致次优动作。航空公司在降低成本方面的利益与非转机乘客的利益之间出现了一种权衡,尽管乘客总体上从该机制中受益。发现航班优先级在网络级别没有显着影响,因为它应用于少量航班。实施的高级航班抵达协调会增加系统中的延误和成本。到达管理器在其范围内优化所有航班的到达顺序,但不考虑航班的不确定性,从而导致次优动作。增加系统的延迟和成本。到达管理器在其范围内优化所有航班的到达顺序,但不考虑航班的不确定性,从而导致次优动作。增加系统的延迟和成本。到达管理器在其范围内优化所有航班的到达顺序,但不考虑航班的不确定性,从而导致次优动作。

更新日期:2021-07-06
down
wechat
bug