A theory of reasoned knowledge is presented by developing and demonstrating the methodology of a novel skeptical critique designed to extend the epistemological practice of belief justification to an epistemological practice of reason justification. Analyses of the reasoning found in the theorizations of certain seminal philosophers and leading scientists will reveal how the absence of the epistemic justification of reason defaults to the use of an unjustified form of reason that runs the play of an unrecognized and unchecked dialectic between epistemology and science. An alternative form of reason will be logically outlined and tested against the formalized skeptical critique in order for the newly recognized dialectic to be checked over reason with provisional epistemic justification. Zeno’s paradox and Green’s and Sellars’ critique of givenness are employed as argument functionaries of the reasoned knowledge theory.

推理知识的理论是通过开发和展示一种新的怀疑主义批判的方法论来提出的，该方法旨在将信念辩护的认识论实践扩展到理性辩护的认识论实践。对某些开创性哲学家和主要科学家的理论中发现的推理的分析将揭示理性的认识论正当性的缺乏如何默认使用不正当形式的理性它在认识论和科学之间进行着一种未被承认和不受约束的辩证法。另一种形式的理性将在逻辑上被勾勒出来，并对照形式化的怀疑论批判进行测试，以便新认可的辩证法通过临时的认识论论证来检验理性。芝诺悖论以及格林和塞拉斯对被给予性的批判被用作推理知识理论的论证功能。