The authors conducted a content analysis of supervisors’ (n = 10) and supervisees’ (n = 31) descriptions (n = 707) of most and least helpful significant events in individual, group, and triadic supervision across 1 semester. Categories by group for each modality and areas of agreement and disagreement are highlighted.

中文翻译：

---

三种监管方式中最有用和最无用的事件

作者对监督者 (n = 10) 和被监督者 (n = 31) 描述 (n = 707) 的个人、小组和三元监督中最有用和最无用的重要事件进行了内容分析。突出显示了每种模式的分组类别以及同意和不同意的领域。