According to Grotius in his Inleiding (2.36.6), the actual use of two houses by the same owner could lead to the implied grant of a servitude if he transferred one of the houses to someone else, ‘without any mention either the one way or the other’. Various interpretations of this text exist, but the consensus is lacking. In this article, the author investigates the meaning and influence of Grotius’s position on implied servitudes in both his time and the following centuries. This research shows how Grotius’s opinion progressed from Bartolus’s approach to implied servitudes and sheds new light on the creation of servitudes by means of destinatione patris familias in the Netherlands.

根据 Grotius 在他的Inleiding (2.36.6)中的说法，如果他将其中一栋房屋转让给其他人，同一所有者实际使用两栋房屋可能会导致暗示授予奴役权，“没有提及任何一种方式”或另一个'。对这段文字有多种解释，但缺乏共识。在这篇文章中，作者调查了格劳秀斯在他那个时代和接下来的几个世纪里对默示奴役的立场的意义和影响。这项研究表明格劳秀斯的观点是如何从 Bartolus 对隐含奴役的方法发展而来的，并为通过荷兰的“父辈家庭”创造奴役提供了新的视角。