This article compares Grotius’s treatments of liability for wrongdoing in natural law and the law of Holland to emphasise the conceptual centrality of fault in both, and places Grotius’s analyses in their historical context by tracing the treatment of strict liability in those intellectual traditions upon which he drew. It focuses in particular on the formulation of obligations quasi ex maleficio to show how the absence of fault rendered the obligation something other than delictual.

中文翻译：

---

格劳秀斯过错责任概念中的过错位置

本文比较了格劳秀斯在自然法和荷兰法中对不法行为责任的处理，以强调两者中过失的概念中心性，并通过追溯格劳秀斯在他所借鉴的知识传统中对严格责任的处理，将其分析置于其历史背景中。 . 它特别关注拟除害人义务的拟定，以表明没有过错是如何使义务变得不属于违法行为的。