We investigate how cause lawyers articulate their demands in court. We do so by examining feminist legal briefs submitted in US Supreme Court cases from 1970 to the present, specifically focusing on the use of race-gender analogical legal framing. We explore the frequency and trends in the use of such arguments as well as the forms these arguments take, including how race-gender analogies parallel frame bridging and transformation. Additionally, we also investigate why activists choose to deploy race-gender analogies in their legal framing and discern that different political, legal, and social contexts can produce different uses of the race-gender analogy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

中文翻译：

---

法律动员和类比法律框架：女权主义诉讼律师对种族性别类比的使用

我们调查事业律师如何在法庭上表达他们的要求。我们通过审查 1970 年至今在美国最高法院案件中提交的女权主义法律摘要来做到这一点，特别关注种族性别类比法律框架的使用。我们探讨了使用这些论点的频率和趋势以及这些论点采用的形式，包括种族-性别类比如何平行框架桥接和转换。此外，我们还调查了为什么激进主义者选择在他们的法律框架中使用种族性别类比，并认识到不同的政治、法律和社会背景可以产生种族性别类比的不同用途。本文受版权保护。版权所有。